Translations:Wikipedia Quality/15/en

From Wikipedia Quality
Jump to: navigation, search
In this case, the quality is modeled as the probability of referring an article to one of two groups – Complete or Incomplete. The conclusion is made on the basis of analysis of various parameters (metrics): the length of the text[1][2][3][4][5][6], the number of references[7][8][9][10], images[11][12], sections[13][14], links to the article, the number of facts[15][16], visits, the number of editions and many others. There are also a number of linguistic parameters,[17][18] which depend on the considered language. Also it can be taken into the account measures that shows number of the links from external sources, such as Reddit, Facebook, Youtube, Twitter, Linkedin, VKontakte and other social services.[19]
  1. Blumenstock, J.E.: Automatically Assessing the Quality of Wikipedia Articles. Tech. rep. (2008)
  2. Conti, R., Marzini, E., Spognardi, A., Matteucci, I., Mori, P., Petrocchi, M.: Maturity Assessment of Wikipedia Medical Articles. In: Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS), 2014 IEEE 27th International Symposium on. pp. 281-286. IEEE (2014)
  3. Yaari, E., Baruchson-Arbib, S., Bar-Ilan, J.: Information Quality Assessment of Community Generated Content: A User Study of Wikipedia. Journal of Information Science 37(5), 487-498 (2011)
  4. Dang, Q.V., Ignat, C.L.: Measuring Quality of Collaboratively Edited Documents: The Case of Wikipedia. In: Collaboration and Internet Computing (CIC), 2016 IEEE 2nd International Conference on. pp. 266-275. IEEE (2016)
  5. Shen, A., Qi, J., Baldwin, T.: A hybrid model for quality assessment of wikipedia articles. In: Proceedings of the Australasian Language Technology Association Workshop 2017. pp. 43-52 (2017)
  6. Zhang, S., Hu, Z., Zhang, C., Yu, K.: History-based article quality assessment on wikipedia. In: Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp), 2018 IEEE International Conference on. pp. 1-8. IEEE (2018)
  7. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named art50
  8. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named art59
  9. Dalip, D.H., Gonçalves, M.A., Cristo, M., Calado, P.: Automatic Quality Assessment of Content Created Collaboratively by Web Communities: A Case Study of Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. pp. 295-304 (2009).
  10. di Sciascio, C., Strohmaier, D., Errecalde, M., Veas, E.: Wikilyzer: interactive information quality assessment in wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. pp. 377-388. ACM (2017)
  11. Wu, K., Zhu, Q., Zhao, Y., Zheng, H.: Mining the Factors Affecting the Quality of Wikipedia Articles. In: Information Science and Management Engineering (ISME), 2010 International Conference of. vol. 1, pp. 343-346. IEEE (2010)
  12. Liu, J., Ram, S.: Using Big Data and Network Analysis to Understand Wikipedia Article Quality. Data & Knowledge Engineering (2018)
  13. Blumenstock, J.E.: Size Matters: Word Count as a Measure of Quality on Wikipedia‎. In: WWW. pp. 1095-1096 (2008).
  14. Lerner, J., Lomi, A.: Knowledge Categorization Affects Popularity and Quality of Wikipedia Articles‎. PloS one 13(1), e0190674 (2018)
  15. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named art6
  16. Lex, Elisabeth, Michael Voelske, Marcelo Errecalde, Edgardo Ferretti, Leticia Cagnina, Christopher Horn, Benno Stein, and Michael Granitzer. Measuring the Quality of Web Content Using Factual Information‎. In Proceedings of the 2nd joint WICOW/AIRWeb workshop on web quality, pp. 7-10. ACM, 2012.
  17. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named art5
  18. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named art7
  19. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named art31