Developing Creativity Competency of Engineers

From Wikipedia Quality
Jump to: navigation, search


Developing Creativity Competency of Engineers
Authors
Pradeep Kashinath Waychal
Publication date
2014
Links

Developing Creativity Competency of Engineers - scientific work about Wikipedia quality published in 2014, written by Pradeep Kashinath Waychal.

Overview

The complete agreement of all stakeholders on the importance of developing the creativity competency of engineering graduates motivated us to undertake this study. Authors chose a senior-level course in Software Testing and Quality Assurance which offered an excellent platform for the experiment as both testing and quality assurance activities can be executed using either routine or mechanical methods or highly creative ones. The earlier attempts reported in literature to develop the creativity competency do not appear to be systematic i.e. they do not follow the measurement ->action plan ->measurement cycle. The measurements, wherever done, are based on the Torrance Test of Critical Thinking (TTCT) and the Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). Authors found these tests costly and decided to search for an appropriate alternative that led us to the Felder Solomon Index of Learning Style (ILS). The Sensing / Intuition dimension of the ILS, like MBTI, is originated in Carl Jung's Theory of Psychological Types. Since a number of MBTI studies have used the dimension for assessing creativity, authors posited that the same ILS dimension could be used to measure the competency. Authors carried out pre-ILS assessment, designed and delivered the course with a variety of activities that could potentially enhance creativity, and carried out course-end post-ILS assessment. Although major changes would not normally be expected after a one-semester course, a hypothesis in the study was that a shift from sensing toward intuition on learning style profiles would be observed, and indeed it was. A paired t- Test indicated that the pre-post change in the average sensing/intuition preference score was statistically significant (p = 0.004). While more research and direct assessment of competency is needed to be able to draw definitive conclusions about both the use of the instrument for measuring creativity and the efficacy of the course structure and contents in developing the competency, the results suggest that the approach is worth exploring.

Embed

Wikipedia Quality

Waychal, Pradeep Kashinath. (2014). "[[Developing Creativity Competency of Engineers]]". Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography Issue 9783319009926, 2014, pp. 17-23.

English Wikipedia

{{cite journal |last1=Waychal |first1=Pradeep Kashinath |title=Developing Creativity Competency of Engineers |date=2014 |url=https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/Developing_Creativity_Competency_of_Engineers |journal=Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography Issue 9783319009926, 2014, pp. 17-23}}

HTML

Waychal, Pradeep Kashinath. (2014). &quot;<a href="https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/Developing_Creativity_Competency_of_Engineers">Developing Creativity Competency of Engineers</a>&quot;. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography Issue 9783319009926, 2014, pp. 17-23.