Difference between revisions of "Your Day in 'Wiki-Court': Adr, Fairness, and Justice in Wikipedia's Global Community"
(Overview - Your Day in 'Wiki-Court': Adr, Fairness, and Justice in Wikipedia's Global Community) |
(Links) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Your Day in 'Wiki-Court': Adr, Fairness, and Justice in Wikipedia's Global Community''' - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2014, written by Sara Ross. | + | '''Your Day in 'Wiki-Court': Adr, Fairness, and Justice in Wikipedia's Global Community''' - scientific work related to [[Wikipedia quality]] published in 2014, written by [[Sara Ross]]. |
== Overview == | == Overview == | ||
| − | Wikipedia has quickly become the largest volume of collected knowledge on the planet, but it is also one of the busiest centers for dispute resolution in the world. From small groups of individuals negotiating article changes on | + | Wikipedia has quickly become the largest volume of collected knowledge on the planet, but it is also one of the busiest centers for dispute resolution in the world. From small groups of individuals negotiating article changes on “[[talk pages]]”, to the involvement of hundreds of people in the formation of the community consensuses needed to implement new policies, to the use of binding arbitration to create final conflict resolutions, the [[Wikipedia community]] has developed a complex network of norms and rules that funnel all disagreements and intractable differences through a series of progressively more involved dispute resolution processes. Author provide an overview and analysis of the dispute resolution processes used by the community and will look to the successes and limitation of these processes. A number of flaws will be identified including the ability for vocal minorities to dominate the [[Wikipedia]] community consensus. A systemic bias will be identified in the behavioural landscape of the community and, finally, it will become apparent that there is room for growth in the website’s inclusiveness, primarily through addressing the logistical realities of a potential user’s access to the time, materials, and knowledge needed to become a contributing member of the Wikipedia community. |
Revision as of 09:37, 14 March 2020
Your Day in 'Wiki-Court': Adr, Fairness, and Justice in Wikipedia's Global Community - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2014, written by Sara Ross.
Overview
Wikipedia has quickly become the largest volume of collected knowledge on the planet, but it is also one of the busiest centers for dispute resolution in the world. From small groups of individuals negotiating article changes on “talk pages”, to the involvement of hundreds of people in the formation of the community consensuses needed to implement new policies, to the use of binding arbitration to create final conflict resolutions, the Wikipedia community has developed a complex network of norms and rules that funnel all disagreements and intractable differences through a series of progressively more involved dispute resolution processes. Author provide an overview and analysis of the dispute resolution processes used by the community and will look to the successes and limitation of these processes. A number of flaws will be identified including the ability for vocal minorities to dominate the Wikipedia community consensus. A systemic bias will be identified in the behavioural landscape of the community and, finally, it will become apparent that there is room for growth in the website’s inclusiveness, primarily through addressing the logistical realities of a potential user’s access to the time, materials, and knowledge needed to become a contributing member of the Wikipedia community.
