Difference between revisions of "Writing for Wikipedia Has Forced Me into Good Scholarly Habits and Accessible Writing"
(New study: Writing for Wikipedia Has Forced Me into Good Scholarly Habits and Accessible Writing) |
(Links) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Writing for Wikipedia Has Forced Me into Good Scholarly Habits and Accessible Writing''' - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2012, written by Martin Poulter. | + | '''Writing for Wikipedia Has Forced Me into Good Scholarly Habits and Accessible Writing''' - scientific work related to [[Wikipedia quality]] published in 2012, written by [[Martin Poulter]]. |
== Overview == | == Overview == | ||
| − | Where Wikipedia has poor-quality articles, authors should regard it as a great opportunity, argues Martin Poulter. Researchers and educators, especially in social science, should get involved in improving the site both for its educational value and to promote their areas of study to a truly global audience. | + | Where [[Wikipedia]] has poor-quality articles, authors should regard it as a great opportunity, argues Martin Poulter. Researchers and educators, especially in social science, should get involved in improving the site both for its educational value and to promote their areas of study to a truly global audience. |
Revision as of 08:37, 9 June 2020
Writing for Wikipedia Has Forced Me into Good Scholarly Habits and Accessible Writing - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2012, written by Martin Poulter.
Overview
Where Wikipedia has poor-quality articles, authors should regard it as a great opportunity, argues Martin Poulter. Researchers and educators, especially in social science, should get involved in improving the site both for its educational value and to promote their areas of study to a truly global audience.
