Difference between revisions of "Wikipedians are Born, Not Made: a Study of Power Editors on Wikipedia"
(Creating a new page - Wikipedians are Born, Not Made: a Study of Power Editors on Wikipedia) |
(Links) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Wikipedians are Born, Not Made: a Study of Power Editors on Wikipedia''' - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2009, written by Katherine A. Panciera, Aaron Halfaker and Loren G. Terveen. | + | '''Wikipedians are Born, Not Made: a Study of Power Editors on Wikipedia''' - scientific work related to [[Wikipedia quality]] published in 2009, written by [[Katherine A. Panciera]], [[Aaron Halfaker]] and [[Loren G. Terveen]]. |
== Overview == | == Overview == | ||
| − | Open content web sites depend on users to produce information of value. Wikipedia is the largest and most well-known such site. Previous work has shown that a small fraction of editors -- Wikipedians -- do most of the work and produce most of the value. Other work has offered conjectures about how Wikipedians differ from other editors and how Wikipedians change over time. Authors quantify and test these conjectures. Authors key findings include: Wikipedians' edits last longer; Wikipedians invoke community norms more often to justify their edits; on many dimensions of activity, Wikipedians start intensely, tail off a little, then maintain a relatively high level of activity over the course of their career. Finally, authors show that the amount of work done by Wikipedians and non-Wikipedians differs significantly from their very first day. Authors results suggest a design opportunity: customizing the initial user experience to improve retention and channel new users' intense energy. | + | Open content web sites depend on users to produce information of value. [[Wikipedia]] is the largest and most well-known such site. Previous work has shown that a small fraction of editors -- [[Wikipedians]] -- do most of the work and produce most of the value. Other work has offered conjectures about how Wikipedians differ from other editors and how Wikipedians change over time. Authors quantify and test these conjectures. Authors key findings include: Wikipedians' edits last longer; Wikipedians invoke community norms more often to justify their edits; on many dimensions of activity, Wikipedians start intensely, tail off a little, then maintain a relatively high level of activity over the course of their career. Finally, authors show that the amount of work done by Wikipedians and non-Wikipedians differs significantly from their very first day. Authors results suggest a design opportunity: customizing the initial user experience to improve retention and channel new users' intense energy. |
Revision as of 13:46, 4 August 2019
Wikipedians are Born, Not Made: a Study of Power Editors on Wikipedia - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2009, written by Katherine A. Panciera, Aaron Halfaker and Loren G. Terveen.
Overview
Open content web sites depend on users to produce information of value. Wikipedia is the largest and most well-known such site. Previous work has shown that a small fraction of editors -- Wikipedians -- do most of the work and produce most of the value. Other work has offered conjectures about how Wikipedians differ from other editors and how Wikipedians change over time. Authors quantify and test these conjectures. Authors key findings include: Wikipedians' edits last longer; Wikipedians invoke community norms more often to justify their edits; on many dimensions of activity, Wikipedians start intensely, tail off a little, then maintain a relatively high level of activity over the course of their career. Finally, authors show that the amount of work done by Wikipedians and non-Wikipedians differs significantly from their very first day. Authors results suggest a design opportunity: customizing the initial user experience to improve retention and channel new users' intense energy.
