Difference between revisions of "Wikipedia for Academic Publishing: Advantages and Challenges"

From Wikipedia Quality
Jump to: navigation, search
(infobox)
(+ Embed)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
== Overview ==
 
== Overview ==
 
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the potential of [[Wikipedia]] as a venue for academic publishing.Design/methodology/approach – By looking at other sources and studying Wikipedia structures, the paper compares the processes of publishing a peer‐reviewed article in Wikipedia and the open access journal model, discusses the advantages and challenges of adopting Wikipedia in academic publishing, and provides suggestions on how to address the challenges.Findings – Compared to an open access journal model, Wikipedia has several advantages for academic publishing: it is less expensive, quicker, more widely read, and offers a wider variety of articles. There are also several major challenges in adopting Wikipedia in the academic community: the web site structure is not well suited to academic publications; the site is not integrated with common academic search engines such as [[Google]] Scholar or with university libraries; and there are concerns among some members of the academic community about the s...
 
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the potential of [[Wikipedia]] as a venue for academic publishing.Design/methodology/approach – By looking at other sources and studying Wikipedia structures, the paper compares the processes of publishing a peer‐reviewed article in Wikipedia and the open access journal model, discusses the advantages and challenges of adopting Wikipedia in academic publishing, and provides suggestions on how to address the challenges.Findings – Compared to an open access journal model, Wikipedia has several advantages for academic publishing: it is less expensive, quicker, more widely read, and offers a wider variety of articles. There are also several major challenges in adopting Wikipedia in the academic community: the web site structure is not well suited to academic publications; the site is not integrated with common academic search engines such as [[Google]] Scholar or with university libraries; and there are concerns among some members of the academic community about the s...
 +
 +
== Embed ==
 +
=== Wikipedia Quality ===
 +
<code>
 +
<nowiki>
 +
Xiao, Lu; Askin, Nicole. (2012). "[[Wikipedia for Academic Publishing: Advantages and Challenges]]". Emerald Group Publishing Limited. DOI: 10.1108/14684521211241396.
 +
</nowiki>
 +
</code>
 +
 +
=== English Wikipedia ===
 +
<code>
 +
<nowiki>
 +
{{cite journal |last1=Xiao |first1=Lu |last2=Askin |first2=Nicole |title=Wikipedia for Academic Publishing: Advantages and Challenges |date=2012 |doi=10.1108/14684521211241396 |url=https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/Wikipedia_for_Academic_Publishing:_Advantages_and_Challenges |journal=Emerald Group Publishing Limited}}
 +
</nowiki>
 +
</code>
 +
 +
=== HTML ===
 +
<code>
 +
<nowiki>
 +
Xiao, Lu; Askin, Nicole. (2012). &amp;quot;<a href="https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/Wikipedia_for_Academic_Publishing:_Advantages_and_Challenges">Wikipedia for Academic Publishing: Advantages and Challenges</a>&amp;quot;. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. DOI: 10.1108/14684521211241396.
 +
</nowiki>
 +
</code>

Revision as of 22:43, 24 September 2020


Wikipedia for Academic Publishing: Advantages and Challenges
Authors
Lu Xiao
Nicole Askin
Publication date
2012
DOI
10.1108/14684521211241396
Links
Original

Wikipedia for Academic Publishing: Advantages and Challenges - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2012, written by Lu Xiao and Nicole Askin.

Overview

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the potential of Wikipedia as a venue for academic publishing.Design/methodology/approach – By looking at other sources and studying Wikipedia structures, the paper compares the processes of publishing a peer‐reviewed article in Wikipedia and the open access journal model, discusses the advantages and challenges of adopting Wikipedia in academic publishing, and provides suggestions on how to address the challenges.Findings – Compared to an open access journal model, Wikipedia has several advantages for academic publishing: it is less expensive, quicker, more widely read, and offers a wider variety of articles. There are also several major challenges in adopting Wikipedia in the academic community: the web site structure is not well suited to academic publications; the site is not integrated with common academic search engines such as Google Scholar or with university libraries; and there are concerns among some members of the academic community about the s...

Embed

Wikipedia Quality

Xiao, Lu; Askin, Nicole. (2012). "[[Wikipedia for Academic Publishing: Advantages and Challenges]]". Emerald Group Publishing Limited. DOI: 10.1108/14684521211241396.

English Wikipedia

{{cite journal |last1=Xiao |first1=Lu |last2=Askin |first2=Nicole |title=Wikipedia for Academic Publishing: Advantages and Challenges |date=2012 |doi=10.1108/14684521211241396 |url=https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/Wikipedia_for_Academic_Publishing:_Advantages_and_Challenges |journal=Emerald Group Publishing Limited}}

HTML

Xiao, Lu; Askin, Nicole. (2012). &quot;<a href="https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/Wikipedia_for_Academic_Publishing:_Advantages_and_Challenges">Wikipedia for Academic Publishing: Advantages and Challenges</a>&quot;. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. DOI: 10.1108/14684521211241396.