Difference between revisions of "Wikipedia as Public Scholarship: Communicating Our Impact Online"
(+ wikilinks) |
(Adding infobox) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {{Infobox work | ||
+ | | title = Wikipedia as Public Scholarship: Communicating Our Impact Online | ||
+ | | date = 2010 | ||
+ | | authors = [[Elizabeth K. Rush]]<br />[[Sarah J. Tracy]] | ||
+ | | doi = 10.1080/00909882.2010.490846 | ||
+ | | link = https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ892421 | ||
+ | }} | ||
'''Wikipedia as Public Scholarship: Communicating Our Impact Online''' - scientific work related to [[Wikipedia quality]] published in 2010, written by [[Elizabeth K. Rush]] and [[Sarah J. Tracy]]. | '''Wikipedia as Public Scholarship: Communicating Our Impact Online''' - scientific work related to [[Wikipedia quality]] published in 2010, written by [[Elizabeth K. Rush]] and [[Sarah J. Tracy]]. | ||
== Overview == | == Overview == | ||
To contribute to the forum asking “Has Communication Research Made a Difference?,” this essay examines whether communication scholarship makes a difference (a) to those who search for information online, (b) in the sense that a primary way research can make a difference is through its accessibility, and (c) by using the criteria of its presence (or absence) on [[Wikipedia]]. In this essay, authors reason that Wikipedia is a useful benchmark for online accessibility of public scholarship in that it provides immediate, freely available information to today's diverse global public seeking online answers to questions and relief from problems. | To contribute to the forum asking “Has Communication Research Made a Difference?,” this essay examines whether communication scholarship makes a difference (a) to those who search for information online, (b) in the sense that a primary way research can make a difference is through its accessibility, and (c) by using the criteria of its presence (or absence) on [[Wikipedia]]. In this essay, authors reason that Wikipedia is a useful benchmark for online accessibility of public scholarship in that it provides immediate, freely available information to today's diverse global public seeking online answers to questions and relief from problems. |
Revision as of 09:25, 23 October 2020
Authors | Elizabeth K. Rush Sarah J. Tracy |
---|---|
Publication date | 2010 |
DOI | 10.1080/00909882.2010.490846 |
Links | Original |
Wikipedia as Public Scholarship: Communicating Our Impact Online - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2010, written by Elizabeth K. Rush and Sarah J. Tracy.
Overview
To contribute to the forum asking “Has Communication Research Made a Difference?,” this essay examines whether communication scholarship makes a difference (a) to those who search for information online, (b) in the sense that a primary way research can make a difference is through its accessibility, and (c) by using the criteria of its presence (or absence) on Wikipedia. In this essay, authors reason that Wikipedia is a useful benchmark for online accessibility of public scholarship in that it provides immediate, freely available information to today's diverse global public seeking online answers to questions and relief from problems.