Difference between revisions of "Wikipedia and History: a Worthwhile Partnership in the Digital Era?"
(Creating a new page - Wikipedia and History: a Worthwhile Partnership in the Digital Era?) |
(+ links) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Wikipedia and History: a Worthwhile Partnership in the Digital Era?''' - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2016, written by Murray G. Phillips. | + | '''Wikipedia and History: a Worthwhile Partnership in the Digital Era?''' - scientific work related to [[Wikipedia quality]] published in 2016, written by [[Murray G. Phillips]]. |
== Overview == | == Overview == | ||
| − | AbstractIt is hard to ignore the changes that have occurred to history-making in the digital age. Historians in the academy have observed, critiqued and, in some instances, engaged in the different forms of contemporary history that are related to the integration of the internet and related technologies into everyday lives. While digital history takes many forms, this paper examines Wikipedia as a mode of historical expression in the context of a project on the history of the Australian Paralympic Movement. Wikipedia’s key core content policies of verification, no original research, and neutral point of view (NPOV) as well as the collaborative premise that underpins the online encyclopaedia are the focal points of analysis. This analysis demonstrates that Wikipedia challenges historians who have traditionally produced the professionally approved artefacts of monographs and journal articles. In essence, Wikipedia requires historians to produce knowledge as part of a collaborative community of practice and,... | + | AbstractIt is hard to ignore the changes that have occurred to history-making in the digital age. Historians in the academy have observed, critiqued and, in some instances, engaged in the different forms of contemporary history that are related to the integration of the internet and related technologies into everyday lives. While digital history takes many forms, this paper examines [[Wikipedia]] as a mode of historical expression in the context of a project on the history of the Australian Paralympic Movement. Wikipedia’s key core content policies of verification, no original research, and [[neutral point of view]] (NPOV) as well as the collaborative premise that underpins the online encyclopaedia are the focal points of analysis. This analysis demonstrates that Wikipedia challenges historians who have traditionally produced the professionally approved artefacts of monographs and journal articles. In essence, Wikipedia requires historians to produce knowledge as part of a collaborative community of practice and,... |
Revision as of 08:32, 9 June 2020
Wikipedia and History: a Worthwhile Partnership in the Digital Era? - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2016, written by Murray G. Phillips.
Overview
AbstractIt is hard to ignore the changes that have occurred to history-making in the digital age. Historians in the academy have observed, critiqued and, in some instances, engaged in the different forms of contemporary history that are related to the integration of the internet and related technologies into everyday lives. While digital history takes many forms, this paper examines Wikipedia as a mode of historical expression in the context of a project on the history of the Australian Paralympic Movement. Wikipedia’s key core content policies of verification, no original research, and neutral point of view (NPOV) as well as the collaborative premise that underpins the online encyclopaedia are the focal points of analysis. This analysis demonstrates that Wikipedia challenges historians who have traditionally produced the professionally approved artefacts of monographs and journal articles. In essence, Wikipedia requires historians to produce knowledge as part of a collaborative community of practice and,...
