Difference between revisions of "What I Know Is...: Establishing Credibility on Wikipedia Talk Pages"
(+ wikilinks) |
(Infobox work) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{Infobox work | ||
| + | | title = What I Know Is...: Establishing Credibility on Wikipedia Talk Pages | ||
| + | | date = 2010 | ||
| + | | authors = [[Meghan Oxley]]<br />[[Jonathan T. Morgan]]<br />[[Mark Zachry]]<br />[[Brian Hutchinson]] | ||
| + | | doi = 10.1145/1832772.1832805 | ||
| + | | link = http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1832772.1832805 | ||
| + | }} | ||
'''What I Know Is...: Establishing Credibility on Wikipedia Talk Pages''' - scientific work related to [[Wikipedia quality]] published in 2010, written by [[Meghan Oxley]], [[Jonathan T. Morgan]], [[Mark Zachry]] and [[Brian Hutchinson]]. | '''What I Know Is...: Establishing Credibility on Wikipedia Talk Pages''' - scientific work related to [[Wikipedia quality]] published in 2010, written by [[Meghan Oxley]], [[Jonathan T. Morgan]], [[Mark Zachry]] and [[Brian Hutchinson]]. | ||
== Overview == | == Overview == | ||
This poster presents a new theoretical framework and research method for studying the relationship between specific types of authority claims and the attempts of contributors to establish [[credibility]] in online, collaborative environments. Authors describe a content analysis method for coding authority claims based on linguistic and rhetorical cues in naturally occurring, text-based discourse. Authors present results from a preliminary analysis of a sample of [[Wikipedia]] talk page discussions focused on recent news events. This method provides a novel framework for capturing and understanding these persuasion-oriented behaviors, and shows potential as a tool for online communication research, including automated text analysis using trained [[natural language processing]] systems. | This poster presents a new theoretical framework and research method for studying the relationship between specific types of authority claims and the attempts of contributors to establish [[credibility]] in online, collaborative environments. Authors describe a content analysis method for coding authority claims based on linguistic and rhetorical cues in naturally occurring, text-based discourse. Authors present results from a preliminary analysis of a sample of [[Wikipedia]] talk page discussions focused on recent news events. This method provides a novel framework for capturing and understanding these persuasion-oriented behaviors, and shows potential as a tool for online communication research, including automated text analysis using trained [[natural language processing]] systems. | ||
Revision as of 09:15, 18 August 2020
Authors | Meghan Oxley Jonathan T. Morgan Mark Zachry Brian Hutchinson |
|---|---|
Publication date | 2010 |
DOI | 10.1145/1832772.1832805 |
Links | Original |
What I Know Is...: Establishing Credibility on Wikipedia Talk Pages - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2010, written by Meghan Oxley, Jonathan T. Morgan, Mark Zachry and Brian Hutchinson.
Overview
This poster presents a new theoretical framework and research method for studying the relationship between specific types of authority claims and the attempts of contributors to establish credibility in online, collaborative environments. Authors describe a content analysis method for coding authority claims based on linguistic and rhetorical cues in naturally occurring, text-based discourse. Authors present results from a preliminary analysis of a sample of Wikipedia talk page discussions focused on recent news events. This method provides a novel framework for capturing and understanding these persuasion-oriented behaviors, and shows potential as a tool for online communication research, including automated text analysis using trained natural language processing systems.
