Difference between revisions of "What I Know Is...: Establishing Credibility on Wikipedia Talk Pages"
(New work - What I Know Is...: Establishing Credibility on Wikipedia Talk Pages) |
(+ wikilinks) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''What I Know Is...: Establishing Credibility on Wikipedia Talk Pages''' - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2010, written by Meghan Oxley, Jonathan T. Morgan, Mark Zachry and Brian Hutchinson. | + | '''What I Know Is...: Establishing Credibility on Wikipedia Talk Pages''' - scientific work related to [[Wikipedia quality]] published in 2010, written by [[Meghan Oxley]], [[Jonathan T. Morgan]], [[Mark Zachry]] and [[Brian Hutchinson]]. |
== Overview == | == Overview == | ||
| − | This poster presents a new theoretical framework and research method for studying the relationship between specific types of authority claims and the attempts of contributors to establish credibility in online, collaborative environments. Authors describe a content analysis method for coding authority claims based on linguistic and rhetorical cues in naturally occurring, text-based discourse. Authors present results from a preliminary analysis of a sample of Wikipedia talk page discussions focused on recent news events. This method provides a novel framework for capturing and understanding these persuasion-oriented behaviors, and shows potential as a tool for online communication research, including automated text analysis using trained natural language processing systems. | + | This poster presents a new theoretical framework and research method for studying the relationship between specific types of authority claims and the attempts of contributors to establish [[credibility]] in online, collaborative environments. Authors describe a content analysis method for coding authority claims based on linguistic and rhetorical cues in naturally occurring, text-based discourse. Authors present results from a preliminary analysis of a sample of [[Wikipedia]] talk page discussions focused on recent news events. This method provides a novel framework for capturing and understanding these persuasion-oriented behaviors, and shows potential as a tool for online communication research, including automated text analysis using trained [[natural language processing]] systems. |
Revision as of 08:44, 10 October 2019
What I Know Is...: Establishing Credibility on Wikipedia Talk Pages - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2010, written by Meghan Oxley, Jonathan T. Morgan, Mark Zachry and Brian Hutchinson.
Overview
This poster presents a new theoretical framework and research method for studying the relationship between specific types of authority claims and the attempts of contributors to establish credibility in online, collaborative environments. Authors describe a content analysis method for coding authority claims based on linguistic and rhetorical cues in naturally occurring, text-based discourse. Authors present results from a preliminary analysis of a sample of Wikipedia talk page discussions focused on recent news events. This method provides a novel framework for capturing and understanding these persuasion-oriented behaviors, and shows potential as a tool for online communication research, including automated text analysis using trained natural language processing systems.
