View source for The Pentad of Cruft: a Taxonomy of Rhetoric Used by Wikipedia Editors based on the Dramatism of Kenneth Burke

{{Infobox work
| title = The Pentad of Cruft: a Taxonomy of Rhetoric Used by Wikipedia Editors based on the Dramatism of Kenneth Burke
| date = 2012
| authors = [[Andrew Famiglietti]]
| doi = 10.5210/fm.v0i0.4082
| link = http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4082/3294
}}
'''The Pentad of Cruft: a Taxonomy of Rhetoric Used by Wikipedia Editors based on the Dramatism of Kenneth Burke''' - scientific work related to [[Wikipedia quality]] published in 2012, written by [[Andrew Famiglietti]].

== Overview ==
It is widely understood that negotiation and debate among editors is key to the [[Wikipedia]]’s system of governance. However, the role of rhetoric, the construction and application of argument, in this process is less well understood. In this paper, Author attempt to move understanding of the role of rhetoric on Wikipedia forward by proposing a taxonomy of rhetoric derived from Kenneth Burke’s dramatism. The proposed taxonomy will classify arguments first by the dominant ratio of elements from Burke’s pentad present in the argument (scene–act, act–agent, etc.), then by the vocabulary employed to make the argument (what Burke called the terministic screen), then by the scope of terms used. Author then demonstrate how this taxonomy might be developed to describe the rhetoric of the [[Wikipedia community]] by employing it to classify a sample of arguments drawn from Wikipedia’s Articles for Deletion (AfD) process. Further development and application of the taxonomy proposed here could help us refine understanding of how and why [[Wikipedia editors]] develop and deploy certain arguments, and which sorts of arguments have the most success in swaying Wikipedian debates.