The Paradox of Novice Contributions to Collective Production: Evidence from Wikipedia

From Wikipedia Quality
Revision as of 12:25, 9 June 2019 by Eleanor (talk | contribs) (The Paradox of Novice Contributions to Collective Production: Evidence from Wikipedia - new page)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

The Paradox of Novice Contributions to Collective Production: Evidence from Wikipedia - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2014, written by Andreea Daniela Gorbatai.

Overview

This study uses the online encyclopedia Wikipedia to examine the links between expert producers of collective goods, demand for such goods, and good quality. Since collective production settings lack a price-like mechanism, producers do not have direct information about demand for goods so they may fail to produce goods that are needed. In this study Author identify a social mechanism through which producers receive, and respond to information about consumer needs across a set of heterogeneous collectively produced goods. Using a longitudinal dataset of 187 million contributions to Wikipedia articles and article demand between October 2008 and February 2009, Author model the contributions of novice and expert producers to article quality, and evaluate the relationship between consumer need and novice and expert contributions. Findings show that novice contributors have a direct negative effect on good quality, but their participation in producing a good motivates experts to contribute and increase the quality of the good, thus mediating the relationship between need for goods and expert contributions. These results provide evidence that collective goods fail to satisfy consumer needs in the absence of direct information from consumers, and highlight the paradoxical role of novices in providing a cue about these needs.