Difference between revisions of "The Intelligible as a New World? Wikipedia Versus the Eighteenth-Century Encyclopedie"
(Adding wikilinks) |
(+ infobox) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {{Infobox work | ||
+ | | title = The Intelligible as a New World? Wikipedia Versus the Eighteenth-Century Encyclopedie | ||
+ | | date = 2011 | ||
+ | | authors = [[Sanja Perovic]] | ||
+ | | doi = 10.3366/para.2011.0003 | ||
+ | | link = https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/abs/10.3366/para.2011.0003 | ||
+ | }} | ||
'''The Intelligible as a New World? Wikipedia Versus the Eighteenth-Century Encyclopedie''' - scientific work related to [[Wikipedia quality]] published in 2011, written by [[Sanja Perovic]]. | '''The Intelligible as a New World? Wikipedia Versus the Eighteenth-Century Encyclopedie''' - scientific work related to [[Wikipedia quality]] published in 2011, written by [[Sanja Perovic]]. | ||
== Overview == | == Overview == | ||
For some time now, certain theorists have been urging us to move beyond text-based understandings of culture to consider the impact of new media on the structure and organization of knowledge. This article, however, reconsiders the usual priority given to digital media by comparing [[Wikipedia]], the free, user-led online Encyclopedia, with Diderot and D'Alembert's eighteenth-century Encyclopedie. It begins by suggesting that the dichotomy between information system and text is not sufficient for describing the differences between the two. It then considers more closely the type of critical thinking presupposed by the Encyclopedie. It concludes by raising the question of the role of judgement in making sense of any encyclopedia in a modern world in which knowledge systems only coexist on the condition of being partially blind to one another. | For some time now, certain theorists have been urging us to move beyond text-based understandings of culture to consider the impact of new media on the structure and organization of knowledge. This article, however, reconsiders the usual priority given to digital media by comparing [[Wikipedia]], the free, user-led online Encyclopedia, with Diderot and D'Alembert's eighteenth-century Encyclopedie. It begins by suggesting that the dichotomy between information system and text is not sufficient for describing the differences between the two. It then considers more closely the type of critical thinking presupposed by the Encyclopedie. It concludes by raising the question of the role of judgement in making sense of any encyclopedia in a modern world in which knowledge systems only coexist on the condition of being partially blind to one another. |
Revision as of 08:53, 18 October 2019
Authors | Sanja Perovic |
---|---|
Publication date | 2011 |
DOI | 10.3366/para.2011.0003 |
Links | Original |
The Intelligible as a New World? Wikipedia Versus the Eighteenth-Century Encyclopedie - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2011, written by Sanja Perovic.
Overview
For some time now, certain theorists have been urging us to move beyond text-based understandings of culture to consider the impact of new media on the structure and organization of knowledge. This article, however, reconsiders the usual priority given to digital media by comparing Wikipedia, the free, user-led online Encyclopedia, with Diderot and D'Alembert's eighteenth-century Encyclopedie. It begins by suggesting that the dichotomy between information system and text is not sufficient for describing the differences between the two. It then considers more closely the type of critical thinking presupposed by the Encyclopedie. It concludes by raising the question of the role of judgement in making sense of any encyclopedia in a modern world in which knowledge systems only coexist on the condition of being partially blind to one another.