Difference between revisions of "Student Perceptions of Writing with Wikipedia in Australian Higher Education"
(New work - Student Perceptions of Writing with Wikipedia in Australian Higher Education) |
(Adding wikilinks) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Student Perceptions of Writing with Wikipedia in Australian Higher Education''' - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2017, written by Robert E. Cummings and Frances DiLauro. | + | '''Student Perceptions of Writing with Wikipedia in Australian Higher Education''' - scientific work related to [[Wikipedia quality]] published in 2017, written by [[Robert E. Cummings]] and [[Frances DiLauro]]. |
== Overview == | == Overview == | ||
| − | The benefits of teaching with Wikipedia in higher education have been investigated for more than a decade and practitioners have claimed a fairly uniform set of outcomes. Although Wikipedia is a global knowledge platform, many studies of the benefits of teaching with Wikipedia have been conducted in U.S. higher education institutions. The authors taught with Wikipedia in writing classes at the University of Sydney, Australia, surveying and interviewing students to both verify the traditional benefits of teaching with Wikipedia and investigate a new set of perceived benefits. This study finds evidence that students who worked with Wikipedia in the writing classroom remained neutral in their opinions as to the legitimacy of information on Wikipedia and skeptical as to its utility in mastering writing course outcomes. | + | The benefits of teaching with [[Wikipedia]] in higher education have been investigated for more than a decade and practitioners have claimed a fairly uniform set of outcomes. Although Wikipedia is a global knowledge platform, many studies of the benefits of teaching with Wikipedia have been conducted in U.S. higher education institutions. The authors taught with Wikipedia in writing classes at the University of Sydney, Australia, surveying and interviewing students to both verify the traditional benefits of teaching with Wikipedia and investigate a new set of perceived benefits. This study finds evidence that students who worked with Wikipedia in the writing classroom remained neutral in their opinions as to the legitimacy of information on Wikipedia and skeptical as to its utility in mastering writing course outcomes. |
Revision as of 09:07, 2 May 2020
Student Perceptions of Writing with Wikipedia in Australian Higher Education - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2017, written by Robert E. Cummings and Frances DiLauro.
Overview
The benefits of teaching with Wikipedia in higher education have been investigated for more than a decade and practitioners have claimed a fairly uniform set of outcomes. Although Wikipedia is a global knowledge platform, many studies of the benefits of teaching with Wikipedia have been conducted in U.S. higher education institutions. The authors taught with Wikipedia in writing classes at the University of Sydney, Australia, surveying and interviewing students to both verify the traditional benefits of teaching with Wikipedia and investigate a new set of perceived benefits. This study finds evidence that students who worked with Wikipedia in the writing classroom remained neutral in their opinions as to the legitimacy of information on Wikipedia and skeptical as to its utility in mastering writing course outcomes.
