Difference between revisions of "Societal Controversies in Wikipedia Articles"

From Wikipedia Quality
Jump to: navigation, search
(Overview - Societal Controversies in Wikipedia Articles)
 
(Wikilinks)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Societal Controversies in Wikipedia Articles''' - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2015, written by Erik Borra, Esther Weltevrede, Paolo Ciuccarelli, Andreas Kaltenbrunner, David Laniado, Giovanni Magni, Michele Mauri, Richard Rogers and Tommaso Venturini.
+
'''Societal Controversies in Wikipedia Articles''' - scientific work related to [[Wikipedia quality]] published in 2015, written by [[Erik Borra]], [[Esther Weltevrede]], [[Paolo Ciuccarelli]], [[Andreas Kaltenbrunner]], [[David Laniado]], [[Giovanni Magni]], [[Michele Mauri]], [[Richard Rogers]] and [[Tommaso Venturini]].
  
 
== Overview ==
 
== Overview ==
Collaborative content creation inevitably reaches situations where different points of view lead to conflict. Authors focus on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia anyone may edit, where disputes about content in controversial articles often reflect larger societal debates. While Wikipedia has a public edit history and discussion section for every article, the substance of these sections is difficult to phantom for Wikipedia users interested in the development of an article and in locating which topics were most controversial. In this paper authors present Contropedia, a tool that augments Wikipedia articles and gives insight into the development of controversial topics. Contropedia uses an efficient language agnostic measure based on the edit history that focuses on wiki links to easily identify which topics within a Wikipedia article have been most controversial and when.
+
Collaborative content creation inevitably reaches situations where different points of view lead to conflict. Authors focus on [[Wikipedia]], the free encyclopedia anyone may edit, where disputes about content in controversial articles often reflect larger societal debates. While Wikipedia has a public edit history and discussion section for every article, the substance of these sections is difficult to phantom for Wikipedia users interested in the development of an article and in locating which topics were most controversial. In this paper authors present Contropedia, a tool that augments Wikipedia articles and gives insight into the development of controversial topics. Contropedia uses an efficient language agnostic measure based on the edit history that focuses on wiki links to easily identify which topics within a Wikipedia article have been most controversial and when.

Latest revision as of 20:46, 24 March 2020

Societal Controversies in Wikipedia Articles - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2015, written by Erik Borra, Esther Weltevrede, Paolo Ciuccarelli, Andreas Kaltenbrunner, David Laniado, Giovanni Magni, Michele Mauri, Richard Rogers and Tommaso Venturini.

Overview

Collaborative content creation inevitably reaches situations where different points of view lead to conflict. Authors focus on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia anyone may edit, where disputes about content in controversial articles often reflect larger societal debates. While Wikipedia has a public edit history and discussion section for every article, the substance of these sections is difficult to phantom for Wikipedia users interested in the development of an article and in locating which topics were most controversial. In this paper authors present Contropedia, a tool that augments Wikipedia articles and gives insight into the development of controversial topics. Contropedia uses an efficient language agnostic measure based on the edit history that focuses on wiki links to easily identify which topics within a Wikipedia article have been most controversial and when.