Difference between revisions of "Researching Trust in Wikipedia"

From Wikipedia Quality
Jump to: navigation, search
(+ infobox)
(Adding embed)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
== Overview ==
 
== Overview ==
 
As the use of collaborative online encyclopedias such as [[Wikipedia]] grows, so does the need for research on how users evaluate its [[credibility]]. In this paper authors compare three experimental approaches to study trust in Wikipedia, namely think aloud, eye-tracking, and online questionnaires. The advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed. Authors conclude that it is best to use multiple methods when researching information trust, as each single one of the discussed methods alone does not give all possible information.
 
As the use of collaborative online encyclopedias such as [[Wikipedia]] grows, so does the need for research on how users evaluate its [[credibility]]. In this paper authors compare three experimental approaches to study trust in Wikipedia, namely think aloud, eye-tracking, and online questionnaires. The advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed. Authors conclude that it is best to use multiple methods when researching information trust, as each single one of the discussed methods alone does not give all possible information.
 +
 +
== Embed ==
 +
=== Wikipedia Quality ===
 +
<code>
 +
<nowiki>
 +
Lucassen, T.; Schraagen, Johannes Martinus Cornelis. (2011). "[[Researching Trust in Wikipedia]]".
 +
</nowiki>
 +
</code>
 +
 +
=== English Wikipedia ===
 +
<code>
 +
<nowiki>
 +
{{cite journal |last1=Lucassen |first1=T. |last2=Schraagen |first2=Johannes Martinus Cornelis |title=Researching Trust in Wikipedia |date=2011 |url=https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/Researching_Trust_in_Wikipedia}}
 +
</nowiki>
 +
</code>
 +
 +
=== HTML ===
 +
<code>
 +
<nowiki>
 +
Lucassen, T.; Schraagen, Johannes Martinus Cornelis. (2011). &amp;quot;<a href="https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/Researching_Trust_in_Wikipedia">Researching Trust in Wikipedia</a>&amp;quot;.
 +
</nowiki>
 +
</code>

Revision as of 11:42, 17 June 2020


Researching Trust in Wikipedia
Authors
T. Lucassen
Johannes Martinus Cornelis Schraagen
Publication date
2011
Links
Original

Researching Trust in Wikipedia - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2011, written by T. Lucassen and Johannes Martinus Cornelis Schraagen.

Overview

As the use of collaborative online encyclopedias such as Wikipedia grows, so does the need for research on how users evaluate its credibility. In this paper authors compare three experimental approaches to study trust in Wikipedia, namely think aloud, eye-tracking, and online questionnaires. The advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed. Authors conclude that it is best to use multiple methods when researching information trust, as each single one of the discussed methods alone does not give all possible information.

Embed

Wikipedia Quality

Lucassen, T.; Schraagen, Johannes Martinus Cornelis. (2011). "[[Researching Trust in Wikipedia]]".

English Wikipedia

{{cite journal |last1=Lucassen |first1=T. |last2=Schraagen |first2=Johannes Martinus Cornelis |title=Researching Trust in Wikipedia |date=2011 |url=https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/Researching_Trust_in_Wikipedia}}

HTML

Lucassen, T.; Schraagen, Johannes Martinus Cornelis. (2011). &quot;<a href="https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/Researching_Trust_in_Wikipedia">Researching Trust in Wikipedia</a>&quot;.