Difference between revisions of "Reference in the Age of Wikipedia, or Not.."
(Adding wikilinks) |
(Adding infobox) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{Infobox work | ||
| + | | title = Reference in the Age of Wikipedia, or Not.. | ||
| + | | date = 2010 | ||
| + | | authors = [[David W. Lewis]] | ||
| + | | doi = 10.7912/C2664W | ||
| + | | link = https://scholarworks.iupui.edu/handle/1805/2127 | ||
| + | }} | ||
'''Reference in the Age of Wikipedia, or Not..''' - scientific work related to [[Wikipedia quality]] published in 2010, written by [[David W. Lewis]]. | '''Reference in the Age of Wikipedia, or Not..''' - scientific work related to [[Wikipedia quality]] published in 2010, written by [[David W. Lewis]]. | ||
== Overview == | == Overview == | ||
The title of my talk today is purposefully provocative. But it is not because Author believe that reference in the age of [[Wikipedia]] is dead, but rather that in the time of Wikipedia authors need to be able to ask and answer the question implied by the, “or not...” Authors all know that the old models of reference work no longer are adequate. Authors challenge is to be able to affirmatively explain what it is authors do and how it adds value. | The title of my talk today is purposefully provocative. But it is not because Author believe that reference in the age of [[Wikipedia]] is dead, but rather that in the time of Wikipedia authors need to be able to ask and answer the question implied by the, “or not...” Authors all know that the old models of reference work no longer are adequate. Authors challenge is to be able to affirmatively explain what it is authors do and how it adds value. | ||
Revision as of 09:13, 18 January 2021
Authors | David W. Lewis |
|---|---|
Publication date | 2010 |
DOI | 10.7912/C2664W |
Links | Original |
Reference in the Age of Wikipedia, or Not.. - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2010, written by David W. Lewis.
Overview
The title of my talk today is purposefully provocative. But it is not because Author believe that reference in the age of Wikipedia is dead, but rather that in the time of Wikipedia authors need to be able to ask and answer the question implied by the, “or not...” Authors all know that the old models of reference work no longer are adequate. Authors challenge is to be able to affirmatively explain what it is authors do and how it adds value.
