Difference between revisions of "Reference in the Age of Wikipedia, or Not.."
(Adding wikilinks) |
(+ category) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {{Infobox work | ||
+ | | title = Reference in the Age of Wikipedia, or Not.. | ||
+ | | date = 2010 | ||
+ | | authors = [[David W. Lewis]] | ||
+ | | doi = 10.7912/C2664W | ||
+ | | link = https://scholarworks.iupui.edu/handle/1805/2127 | ||
+ | }} | ||
'''Reference in the Age of Wikipedia, or Not..''' - scientific work related to [[Wikipedia quality]] published in 2010, written by [[David W. Lewis]]. | '''Reference in the Age of Wikipedia, or Not..''' - scientific work related to [[Wikipedia quality]] published in 2010, written by [[David W. Lewis]]. | ||
== Overview == | == Overview == | ||
The title of my talk today is purposefully provocative. But it is not because Author believe that reference in the age of [[Wikipedia]] is dead, but rather that in the time of Wikipedia authors need to be able to ask and answer the question implied by the, “or not...” Authors all know that the old models of reference work no longer are adequate. Authors challenge is to be able to affirmatively explain what it is authors do and how it adds value. | The title of my talk today is purposefully provocative. But it is not because Author believe that reference in the age of [[Wikipedia]] is dead, but rather that in the time of Wikipedia authors need to be able to ask and answer the question implied by the, “or not...” Authors all know that the old models of reference work no longer are adequate. Authors challenge is to be able to affirmatively explain what it is authors do and how it adds value. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Embed == | ||
+ | === Wikipedia Quality === | ||
+ | <code> | ||
+ | <nowiki> | ||
+ | Lewis, David W.. (2010). "[[Reference in the Age of Wikipedia, or Not..]]". Neal-Schuman Publishers. DOI: 10.7912/C2664W. | ||
+ | </nowiki> | ||
+ | </code> | ||
+ | |||
+ | === English Wikipedia === | ||
+ | <code> | ||
+ | <nowiki> | ||
+ | {{cite journal |last1=Lewis |first1=David W. |title=Reference in the Age of Wikipedia, or Not.. |date=2010 |doi=10.7912/C2664W |url=https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/Reference_in_the_Age_of_Wikipedia,_or_Not.. |journal=Neal-Schuman Publishers}} | ||
+ | </nowiki> | ||
+ | </code> | ||
+ | |||
+ | === HTML === | ||
+ | <code> | ||
+ | <nowiki> | ||
+ | Lewis, David W.. (2010). &quot;<a href="https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/Reference_in_the_Age_of_Wikipedia,_or_Not..">Reference in the Age of Wikipedia, or Not..</a>&quot;. Neal-Schuman Publishers. DOI: 10.7912/C2664W. | ||
+ | </nowiki> | ||
+ | </code> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Scientific works]] |
Latest revision as of 11:56, 7 March 2021
Authors | David W. Lewis |
---|---|
Publication date | 2010 |
DOI | 10.7912/C2664W |
Links | Original |
Reference in the Age of Wikipedia, or Not.. - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2010, written by David W. Lewis.
Overview
The title of my talk today is purposefully provocative. But it is not because Author believe that reference in the age of Wikipedia is dead, but rather that in the time of Wikipedia authors need to be able to ask and answer the question implied by the, “or not...” Authors all know that the old models of reference work no longer are adequate. Authors challenge is to be able to affirmatively explain what it is authors do and how it adds value.
Embed
Wikipedia Quality
Lewis, David W.. (2010). "[[Reference in the Age of Wikipedia, or Not..]]". Neal-Schuman Publishers. DOI: 10.7912/C2664W.
English Wikipedia
{{cite journal |last1=Lewis |first1=David W. |title=Reference in the Age of Wikipedia, or Not.. |date=2010 |doi=10.7912/C2664W |url=https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/Reference_in_the_Age_of_Wikipedia,_or_Not.. |journal=Neal-Schuman Publishers}}
HTML
Lewis, David W.. (2010). "<a href="https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/Reference_in_the_Age_of_Wikipedia,_or_Not..">Reference in the Age of Wikipedia, or Not..</a>". Neal-Schuman Publishers. DOI: 10.7912/C2664W.