Difference between revisions of "Readability of Wikipedia"

From Wikipedia Quality
Jump to: navigation, search
(Adding wikilinks)
(Infobox work)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{Infobox work
 +
| title = Readability of Wikipedia
 +
| date = 2012
 +
| authors = [[T. Lucassen]]<br />[[Roald Dijkstra]]<br />[[Johannes Martinus Cornelis Schraagen]]
 +
| doi = 10.5210/fm.v0i0.3916
 +
| link = http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3916/3297
 +
}}
 
'''Readability of Wikipedia''' - scientific work related to [[Wikipedia quality]] published in 2012, written by [[T. Lucassen]], [[Roald Dijkstra]] and [[Johannes Martinus Cornelis Schraagen]].
 
'''Readability of Wikipedia''' - scientific work related to [[Wikipedia quality]] published in 2012, written by [[T. Lucassen]], [[Roald Dijkstra]] and [[Johannes Martinus Cornelis Schraagen]].
  
 
== Overview ==
 
== Overview ==
 
Wikipedia is becoming widely acknowledged as a reliable source of encyclopedic information. However, concerns have been expressed about its [[readability]]. [[Wikipedia]] articles might be written in a language too difficult to be understood by most of its visitors. In this study, authors apply the Flesch reading ease test to all available articles from the [[English Wikipedia]] to investigate these concerns. The results show that overall readability is poor, with 75 percent of all articles scoring below the desired readability score. The ‘Simple English’ Wikipedia scores better, but its readability is still insufficient for its target audience. A demo of methodology is available at www.readabilityofwikipedia.com .
 
Wikipedia is becoming widely acknowledged as a reliable source of encyclopedic information. However, concerns have been expressed about its [[readability]]. [[Wikipedia]] articles might be written in a language too difficult to be understood by most of its visitors. In this study, authors apply the Flesch reading ease test to all available articles from the [[English Wikipedia]] to investigate these concerns. The results show that overall readability is poor, with 75 percent of all articles scoring below the desired readability score. The ‘Simple English’ Wikipedia scores better, but its readability is still insufficient for its target audience. A demo of methodology is available at www.readabilityofwikipedia.com .

Revision as of 09:12, 21 January 2020


Readability of Wikipedia
Authors
T. Lucassen
Roald Dijkstra
Johannes Martinus Cornelis Schraagen
Publication date
2012
DOI
10.5210/fm.v0i0.3916
Links
Original

Readability of Wikipedia - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2012, written by T. Lucassen, Roald Dijkstra and Johannes Martinus Cornelis Schraagen.

Overview

Wikipedia is becoming widely acknowledged as a reliable source of encyclopedic information. However, concerns have been expressed about its readability. Wikipedia articles might be written in a language too difficult to be understood by most of its visitors. In this study, authors apply the Flesch reading ease test to all available articles from the English Wikipedia to investigate these concerns. The results show that overall readability is poor, with 75 percent of all articles scoring below the desired readability score. The ‘Simple English’ Wikipedia scores better, but its readability is still insufficient for its target audience. A demo of methodology is available at www.readabilityofwikipedia.com .