Difference between revisions of "Quality dimension/zh"
(Created page with "质量尺寸") |
(Created page with "'''质量维度'''—用于数据（信息）质量评估的一组度量（特征）。文献中对信息质量的度量和相关维度有不同的定义方法。") |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<languages /> | <languages /> | ||
| − | ''' | + | '''质量维度'''—用于数据（信息）质量评估的一组度量（特征）。文献中对信息质量的度量和相关维度有不同的定义方法。 |
| − | |||
[[File:Dimensions.png|350px|thumb|right|[[Quality dimensions]] of the traditional [[encyclopedia|encyclopedias]], [[Wikipedia]], [[Web 2.0]]<ref name="art100" />]]Due the fact that on the one hand Wikipedia is an [[encyclopedia]], and on the other hand - a representative of [[Web 2.0]] services, based on the literature below are presented the most important quality dimensions for three sources of information:<ref name="art100" /> | [[File:Dimensions.png|350px|thumb|right|[[Quality dimensions]] of the traditional [[encyclopedia|encyclopedias]], [[Wikipedia]], [[Web 2.0]]<ref name="art100" />]]Due the fact that on the one hand Wikipedia is an [[encyclopedia]], and on the other hand - a representative of [[Web 2.0]] services, based on the literature below are presented the most important quality dimensions for three sources of information:<ref name="art100" /> | ||
Revision as of 19:25, 13 April 2019
质量维度—用于数据（信息）质量评估的一组度量（特征）。文献中对信息质量的度量和相关维度有不同的定义方法。
- Traditional encyclopedias: Authority, Completeness, Format, Objectivity, Style, Timeliness, Uniqueness
- Web 2.0 services: Accessibility, Completeness, Credibility, Involvement, Objectivity, Readability, Relevance, Reputation, Style, Timeliness, Uniqueness, Usefulness
- Wikipedia: Completeness, Credibility, Objectivity, Readability, Relevance, Style, Timeliness
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Lewoniewski, W. (2019). Measures for Quality Assessment of Articles and Infoboxes in Multilingual Wikipedia. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 339. Springer, Cham (pp. 619-633)
