Difference between revisions of "Prospero and Plagiarism: Early Modern Studies and the Rise of Wikipedia"
(Embed for English Wikipedia, HTML) |
(Category) |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
</nowiki> | </nowiki> | ||
</code> | </code> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Scientific works]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:11, 2 May 2020
Authors | Matthew Steggle |
|---|---|
Publication date | 2010 |
DOI | 10.16995/dscn.260 |
Links | Original |
Prospero and Plagiarism: Early Modern Studies and the Rise of Wikipedia - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2010, written by Matthew Steggle.
Overview
In recent years, Wikipedia has emerged as one of the most prominent sources, of any sort, of information and ideas relating to what one might call early modern studies. This article considers Wikipedia's troubled relationship with conventional academic authority, and also the paradox whereby Wikipedia articles are at the same time very mutable and very persistent. As case studies, it looks in detail at the evolution and dissemination of two Wikipedia articles, on The Tempest and on the minor writer Gervase Markham. Wikipedia, it will be argued, is a project whose conflicted attitudes to knowledge and authority have parallels with the early modern.
Embed
Wikipedia Quality
Steggle, Matthew. (2010). "[[Prospero and Plagiarism: Early Modern Studies and the Rise of Wikipedia]]". Société canadienne des humanités numériques (CSDH/SCHN). DOI: 10.16995/dscn.260.
English Wikipedia
{{cite journal |last1=Steggle |first1=Matthew |title=Prospero and Plagiarism: Early Modern Studies and the Rise of Wikipedia |date=2010 |doi=10.16995/dscn.260 |url=https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/Prospero_and_Plagiarism:_Early_Modern_Studies_and_the_Rise_of_Wikipedia |journal=Société canadienne des humanités numériques (CSDH/SCHN)}}
HTML
Steggle, Matthew. (2010). "<a href="https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/Prospero_and_Plagiarism:_Early_Modern_Studies_and_the_Rise_of_Wikipedia">Prospero and Plagiarism: Early Modern Studies and the Rise of Wikipedia</a>". Société canadienne des humanités numériques (CSDH/SCHN). DOI: 10.16995/dscn.260.
