Difference between revisions of "Participation in Wikipedia's Article Deletion Processes"

From Wikipedia Quality
Jump to: navigation, search
(Wikilinks)
(Infobox work)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{Infobox work
 +
| title = Participation in Wikipedia's Article Deletion Processes
 +
| date = 2011
 +
| authors = [[R. Stuart Geiger]]<br />[[Heather Ford]]
 +
| doi = 10.1145/2038558.2038593
 +
| link = http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2038558.2038593
 +
| plink = https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rstuart_Geiger/publication/221367824_Participation_in_Wikipedia&#039;s_article_deletion_processes/links/00463539f034226a89000000.pdf
 +
}}
 
'''Participation in Wikipedia's Article Deletion Processes''' - scientific work related to [[Wikipedia quality]] published in 2011, written by [[R. Stuart Geiger]] and [[Heather Ford]].
 
'''Participation in Wikipedia's Article Deletion Processes''' - scientific work related to [[Wikipedia quality]] published in 2011, written by [[R. Stuart Geiger]] and [[Heather Ford]].
  
 
== Overview ==
 
== Overview ==
 
Authors present results on a study of two levels of [[Wikipedia]]'s article deletion process: speedy deletions (or CSDs) and articles for deletions (or AfDs). Authors findings indicate that the deletion process is heavily frequented by a relatively small number of longstanding users. In analyzing the rationales given for such deletions, it is apparent that the vast majority of such deleted articles are not spam, vandalism, or 'patent nonsense,' but rather articles which could be considered encyclopedic, but do not fit the project's standards.
 
Authors present results on a study of two levels of [[Wikipedia]]'s article deletion process: speedy deletions (or CSDs) and articles for deletions (or AfDs). Authors findings indicate that the deletion process is heavily frequented by a relatively small number of longstanding users. In analyzing the rationales given for such deletions, it is apparent that the vast majority of such deleted articles are not spam, vandalism, or 'patent nonsense,' but rather articles which could be considered encyclopedic, but do not fit the project's standards.

Revision as of 07:47, 3 December 2019


Participation in Wikipedia's Article Deletion Processes
Authors
R. Stuart Geiger
Heather Ford
Publication date
2011
DOI
10.1145/2038558.2038593
Links
Original Preprint

Participation in Wikipedia's Article Deletion Processes - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2011, written by R. Stuart Geiger and Heather Ford.

Overview

Authors present results on a study of two levels of Wikipedia's article deletion process: speedy deletions (or CSDs) and articles for deletions (or AfDs). Authors findings indicate that the deletion process is heavily frequented by a relatively small number of longstanding users. In analyzing the rationales given for such deletions, it is apparent that the vast majority of such deleted articles are not spam, vandalism, or 'patent nonsense,' but rather articles which could be considered encyclopedic, but do not fit the project's standards.