Difference between revisions of "One-Shot Wikipedia: an Edit-Sprint Toward Information Literacy"
(+ wikilinks) |
(infobox) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{Infobox work | ||
| + | | title = One-Shot Wikipedia: an Edit-Sprint Toward Information Literacy | ||
| + | | date = 2015 | ||
| + | | authors = [[John T. Oliver]] | ||
| + | | doi = 10.1108/RSR-10-2014-0043 | ||
| + | | link = http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/RSR-10-2014-0043 | ||
| + | }} | ||
'''One-Shot Wikipedia: an Edit-Sprint Toward Information Literacy''' - scientific work related to [[Wikipedia quality]] published in 2015, written by [[John T. Oliver]]. | '''One-Shot Wikipedia: an Edit-Sprint Toward Information Literacy''' - scientific work related to [[Wikipedia quality]] published in 2015, written by [[John T. Oliver]]. | ||
== Overview == | == Overview == | ||
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate which learning targets can be achieved by using [[Wikipedia]] as a tool for teaching information literacy within the context of brief one-shot library instruction sessions. Design/methodology/approach – In this case study, a Wikipedia-editing activity was incorporated into 2-hour one-shot instruction sessions. A variety of qualitative data were collected during these sessions: Student reflections during a facilitated discussion, student responses to exit-survey questions and instructor observations about the extent to which students completed Wikipedia-editing tasks. Findings – Students found Wikipedia-editing activities and Wikipedia-related discussions engaging, and as a result they seemed to learn valuable lessons about research and writing. Students participating in this project effectively identified gaps in Wikipedia entries, critically evaluated and used sources to address those gaps and appropriately documented those materials. Students were easily... | Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate which learning targets can be achieved by using [[Wikipedia]] as a tool for teaching information literacy within the context of brief one-shot library instruction sessions. Design/methodology/approach – In this case study, a Wikipedia-editing activity was incorporated into 2-hour one-shot instruction sessions. A variety of qualitative data were collected during these sessions: Student reflections during a facilitated discussion, student responses to exit-survey questions and instructor observations about the extent to which students completed Wikipedia-editing tasks. Findings – Students found Wikipedia-editing activities and Wikipedia-related discussions engaging, and as a result they seemed to learn valuable lessons about research and writing. Students participating in this project effectively identified gaps in Wikipedia entries, critically evaluated and used sources to address those gaps and appropriately documented those materials. Students were easily... | ||
Revision as of 08:09, 17 November 2020
Authors | John T. Oliver |
|---|---|
Publication date | 2015 |
DOI | 10.1108/RSR-10-2014-0043 |
Links | Original |
One-Shot Wikipedia: an Edit-Sprint Toward Information Literacy - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2015, written by John T. Oliver.
Overview
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate which learning targets can be achieved by using Wikipedia as a tool for teaching information literacy within the context of brief one-shot library instruction sessions. Design/methodology/approach – In this case study, a Wikipedia-editing activity was incorporated into 2-hour one-shot instruction sessions. A variety of qualitative data were collected during these sessions: Student reflections during a facilitated discussion, student responses to exit-survey questions and instructor observations about the extent to which students completed Wikipedia-editing tasks. Findings – Students found Wikipedia-editing activities and Wikipedia-related discussions engaging, and as a result they seemed to learn valuable lessons about research and writing. Students participating in this project effectively identified gaps in Wikipedia entries, critically evaluated and used sources to address those gaps and appropriately documented those materials. Students were easily...
