Difference between revisions of "On Trusting Wikipedia"
(Adding infobox) |
(+ Embed) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== Overview == | == Overview == | ||
Given the fact that many people use [[Wikipedia]] , authors should ask: Can authors trust it? The empirical evidence suggests that Wikipedia articles are sometimes quite good but that they vary a great deal. As such, it is wrong to ask for a monolithic verdict on Wikipedia . Interacting with Wikipedia involves assessing where it is likely to be reliable and where not. Author identify five strategies that authors use to assess claims from other sources and argue that, to a greater of lesser degree, Wikipedia frustrates all of them. Interacting responsibly with something like Wikipedia requires new epistemic methods and strategies. | Given the fact that many people use [[Wikipedia]] , authors should ask: Can authors trust it? The empirical evidence suggests that Wikipedia articles are sometimes quite good but that they vary a great deal. As such, it is wrong to ask for a monolithic verdict on Wikipedia . Interacting with Wikipedia involves assessing where it is likely to be reliable and where not. Author identify five strategies that authors use to assess claims from other sources and argue that, to a greater of lesser degree, Wikipedia frustrates all of them. Interacting responsibly with something like Wikipedia requires new epistemic methods and strategies. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Embed == | ||
| + | === Wikipedia Quality === | ||
| + | <code> | ||
| + | <nowiki> | ||
| + | Magnus, P. D.. (2009). "[[On Trusting Wikipedia]]". Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.3366/E1742360008000555. | ||
| + | </nowiki> | ||
| + | </code> | ||
| + | |||
| + | === English Wikipedia === | ||
| + | <code> | ||
| + | <nowiki> | ||
| + | {{cite journal |last1=Magnus |first1=P. D. |title=On Trusting Wikipedia |date=2009 |doi=10.3366/E1742360008000555 |url=https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/On_Trusting_Wikipedia |journal=Cambridge University Press}} | ||
| + | </nowiki> | ||
| + | </code> | ||
| + | |||
| + | === HTML === | ||
| + | <code> | ||
| + | <nowiki> | ||
| + | Magnus, P. D.. (2009). &quot;<a href="https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/On_Trusting_Wikipedia">On Trusting Wikipedia</a>&quot;. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.3366/E1742360008000555. | ||
| + | </nowiki> | ||
| + | </code> | ||
Revision as of 09:49, 12 February 2021
Authors | P. D. Magnus |
|---|---|
Publication date | 2009 |
DOI | 10.3366/E1742360008000555 |
Links | Original |
On Trusting Wikipedia - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2009, written by P. D. Magnus.
Overview
Given the fact that many people use Wikipedia , authors should ask: Can authors trust it? The empirical evidence suggests that Wikipedia articles are sometimes quite good but that they vary a great deal. As such, it is wrong to ask for a monolithic verdict on Wikipedia . Interacting with Wikipedia involves assessing where it is likely to be reliable and where not. Author identify five strategies that authors use to assess claims from other sources and argue that, to a greater of lesser degree, Wikipedia frustrates all of them. Interacting responsibly with something like Wikipedia requires new epistemic methods and strategies.
Embed
Wikipedia Quality
Magnus, P. D.. (2009). "[[On Trusting Wikipedia]]". Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.3366/E1742360008000555.
English Wikipedia
{{cite journal |last1=Magnus |first1=P. D. |title=On Trusting Wikipedia |date=2009 |doi=10.3366/E1742360008000555 |url=https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/On_Trusting_Wikipedia |journal=Cambridge University Press}}
HTML
Magnus, P. D.. (2009). "<a href="https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/On_Trusting_Wikipedia">On Trusting Wikipedia</a>". Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.3366/E1742360008000555.
