Difference between revisions of "Is Wikipedia a Reliable Learning Resource for Medical Students? Evaluating Respiratory Topics"
(+ Infobox work) |
(+ cat.) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== Overview == | == Overview == | ||
The aim of the present study was to critically evaluate the accuracy and [[readability]] of [[English Wikipedia]] articles on the respiratory system and its disorders and whether they can be a suitable resource for medical students. On April 27, 2014, English [[Wikipedia]] was searched for articles on respiratory topics. Using a modified DISCERN instrument, articles were independently scored by three assessors. The scoring targeted content accuracy, frequency of updating, and quality of references. The readability of articles was measured using two other instruments. The mean DISCERN score for the 40 articles identified was 26.4 ± 6.3. Most articles covered causes, signs and symptoms, prevention, and treatment. However, several knowledge deficiencies in the pathogenesis of diseases, investigations needed, and treatment were observed. The total number of references for the 40 articles was 1,654, and the references varied from 0 to 168 references, but several problems were identified in the list of references and citat... | The aim of the present study was to critically evaluate the accuracy and [[readability]] of [[English Wikipedia]] articles on the respiratory system and its disorders and whether they can be a suitable resource for medical students. On April 27, 2014, English [[Wikipedia]] was searched for articles on respiratory topics. Using a modified DISCERN instrument, articles were independently scored by three assessors. The scoring targeted content accuracy, frequency of updating, and quality of references. The readability of articles was measured using two other instruments. The mean DISCERN score for the 40 articles identified was 26.4 ± 6.3. Most articles covered causes, signs and symptoms, prevention, and treatment. However, several knowledge deficiencies in the pathogenesis of diseases, investigations needed, and treatment were observed. The total number of references for the 40 articles was 1,654, and the references varied from 0 to 168 references, but several problems were identified in the list of references and citat... | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Embed == | ||
| + | === Wikipedia Quality === | ||
| + | <code> | ||
| + | <nowiki> | ||
| + | Azer, Samy A.. (2015). "[[Is Wikipedia a Reliable Learning Resource for Medical Students? Evaluating Respiratory Topics]]". American Physiological Society Bethesda, MD. DOI: 10.1152/advan.00110.2014. | ||
| + | </nowiki> | ||
| + | </code> | ||
| + | |||
| + | === English Wikipedia === | ||
| + | <code> | ||
| + | <nowiki> | ||
| + | {{cite journal |last1=Azer |first1=Samy A. |title=Is Wikipedia a Reliable Learning Resource for Medical Students? Evaluating Respiratory Topics |date=2015 |doi=10.1152/advan.00110.2014 |url=https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/Is_Wikipedia_a_Reliable_Learning_Resource_for_Medical_Students?_Evaluating_Respiratory_Topics |journal=American Physiological Society Bethesda, MD}} | ||
| + | </nowiki> | ||
| + | </code> | ||
| + | |||
| + | === HTML === | ||
| + | <code> | ||
| + | <nowiki> | ||
| + | Azer, Samy A.. (2015). &quot;<a href="https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/Is_Wikipedia_a_Reliable_Learning_Resource_for_Medical_Students?_Evaluating_Respiratory_Topics">Is Wikipedia a Reliable Learning Resource for Medical Students? Evaluating Respiratory Topics</a>&quot;. American Physiological Society Bethesda, MD. DOI: 10.1152/advan.00110.2014. | ||
| + | </nowiki> | ||
| + | </code> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Scientific works]] | ||
| + | [[Category:English Wikipedia]] | ||
Latest revision as of 10:42, 3 February 2021
Authors | Samy A. Azer |
|---|---|
Publication date | 2015 |
DOI | 10.1152/advan.00110.2014 |
Links | Original |
Is Wikipedia a Reliable Learning Resource for Medical Students? Evaluating Respiratory Topics - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2015, written by Samy A. Azer.
Overview
The aim of the present study was to critically evaluate the accuracy and readability of English Wikipedia articles on the respiratory system and its disorders and whether they can be a suitable resource for medical students. On April 27, 2014, English Wikipedia was searched for articles on respiratory topics. Using a modified DISCERN instrument, articles were independently scored by three assessors. The scoring targeted content accuracy, frequency of updating, and quality of references. The readability of articles was measured using two other instruments. The mean DISCERN score for the 40 articles identified was 26.4 ± 6.3. Most articles covered causes, signs and symptoms, prevention, and treatment. However, several knowledge deficiencies in the pathogenesis of diseases, investigations needed, and treatment were observed. The total number of references for the 40 articles was 1,654, and the references varied from 0 to 168 references, but several problems were identified in the list of references and citat...
Embed
Wikipedia Quality
Azer, Samy A.. (2015). "[[Is Wikipedia a Reliable Learning Resource for Medical Students? Evaluating Respiratory Topics]]". American Physiological Society Bethesda, MD. DOI: 10.1152/advan.00110.2014.
English Wikipedia
{{cite journal |last1=Azer |first1=Samy A. |title=Is Wikipedia a Reliable Learning Resource for Medical Students? Evaluating Respiratory Topics |date=2015 |doi=10.1152/advan.00110.2014 |url=https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/Is_Wikipedia_a_Reliable_Learning_Resource_for_Medical_Students?_Evaluating_Respiratory_Topics |journal=American Physiological Society Bethesda, MD}}
HTML
Azer, Samy A.. (2015). "<a href="https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/Is_Wikipedia_a_Reliable_Learning_Resource_for_Medical_Students?_Evaluating_Respiratory_Topics">Is Wikipedia a Reliable Learning Resource for Medical Students? Evaluating Respiratory Topics</a>". American Physiological Society Bethesda, MD. DOI: 10.1152/advan.00110.2014.
