Difference between revisions of "How Do Baidu Baike and Chinese Wikipedia Filter Contribution?: a Case Study of Network Gatekeeping"

From Wikipedia Quality
Jump to: navigation, search
(New study: How Do Baidu Baike and Chinese Wikipedia Filter Contribution?: a Case Study of Network Gatekeeping)
 
(Adding wikilinks)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''How Do Baidu Baike and Chinese Wikipedia Filter Contribution?: a Case Study of Network Gatekeeping''' - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2013, written by Han-Teng Liao.
+
'''How Do Baidu Baike and Chinese Wikipedia Filter Contribution?: a Case Study of Network Gatekeeping''' - scientific work related to [[Wikipedia quality]] published in 2013, written by [[Han-Teng Liao]].
  
 
== Overview ==
 
== Overview ==
Though open collaboration websites such as Wikipedia have attracted attention for their more inclusive and participatory potentials, it becomes increasingly clear that certain information filtering/control or gatekeeping mechanisms are set to render them manageable. Applying the network gatekeeping theory, this paper presents a case study of Baidu Baike and Chinese Wikipedia, focusing on their editorial policies and practices, which have not been systematically examined. Through a detailed analysis of editorial priorities, power users, and geo-linguistic arrangement over how, by whom and for whom and which types of information are processed, the findings show different bases and salience components for distinct network gatekeeping processes. In Chinese Wikipedia, filtering copyright-dubious materials and accommodating Chinese geo-linguistic variants are more salient, whereas censoring politically-sensitive content and enforcing a national cultural political framework of People's Republic of China are more salient in Baidu Baike. The usefulness and limitations of applying network gatekeeping theory for open collaboration websites is discussed.
+
Though open collaboration websites such as [[Wikipedia]] have attracted attention for their more inclusive and participatory potentials, it becomes increasingly clear that certain information filtering/control or gatekeeping mechanisms are set to render them manageable. Applying the network gatekeeping theory, this paper presents a case study of [[Baidu]] Baike and [[Chinese Wikipedia]], focusing on their editorial policies and practices, which have not been systematically examined. Through a detailed analysis of editorial priorities, power users, and geo-linguistic arrangement over how, by whom and for whom and which types of information are processed, the findings show different bases and salience components for distinct network gatekeeping processes. In Chinese Wikipedia, filtering copyright-dubious materials and accommodating Chinese geo-linguistic variants are more salient, whereas censoring politically-sensitive content and enforcing a national cultural political framework of People's Republic of China are more salient in Baidu Baike. The usefulness and limitations of applying network gatekeeping theory for open collaboration websites is discussed.

Revision as of 11:16, 26 November 2019

How Do Baidu Baike and Chinese Wikipedia Filter Contribution?: a Case Study of Network Gatekeeping - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2013, written by Han-Teng Liao.

Overview

Though open collaboration websites such as Wikipedia have attracted attention for their more inclusive and participatory potentials, it becomes increasingly clear that certain information filtering/control or gatekeeping mechanisms are set to render them manageable. Applying the network gatekeeping theory, this paper presents a case study of Baidu Baike and Chinese Wikipedia, focusing on their editorial policies and practices, which have not been systematically examined. Through a detailed analysis of editorial priorities, power users, and geo-linguistic arrangement over how, by whom and for whom and which types of information are processed, the findings show different bases and salience components for distinct network gatekeeping processes. In Chinese Wikipedia, filtering copyright-dubious materials and accommodating Chinese geo-linguistic variants are more salient, whereas censoring politically-sensitive content and enforcing a national cultural political framework of People's Republic of China are more salient in Baidu Baike. The usefulness and limitations of applying network gatekeeping theory for open collaboration websites is discussed.