Difference between revisions of "Gender Differences Concerning Wikipedia: a Follow‐Up Study"

From Wikipedia Quality
Jump to: navigation, search
(New work - Gender Differences Concerning Wikipedia: a Follow‐Up Study)
 
(wikilinks)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Gender Differences Concerning Wikipedia: a Follow‐Up Study''' - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2012, written by Sook Lim.
+
'''Gender Differences Concerning Wikipedia: a Follow‐Up Study''' - scientific work related to [[Wikipedia quality]] published in 2012, written by [[Sook Lim]].
  
 
== Overview ==
 
== Overview ==
This follow-up study of Lim and Kwon (2010) examined whether gender differences persist in certain aspects concerning Wikipedia. Additionally, this study examined other new variables, such as satisficing (satisfying and sufficing) and peer approval in relation to gender. Data were collected using a web survey in fall 2011. A total of 123 surveys were usable for this study. The key findings show that two data sets collected three years apart were consistent with each other, demonstrating that the persistence of gender differences in college students with respect to Wikipedia use, their perceived credibility of Wikipedia, and self-evaluation of their ability discerning the credibility of Wikipedia information. In addition, this study found that male students showed a higher level of satisficing with Wikipedia and tended to report a higher level of their peer's approval for Wikipedia than their female counterparts did. The findings call for attention to educational interventions to narrow the gender gap concerning Wikipedia or user-generated content (UGC).
+
This follow-up study of Lim and Kwon (2010) examined whether gender differences persist in certain aspects concerning [[Wikipedia]]. Additionally, this study examined other new variables, such as satisficing (satisfying and sufficing) and peer approval in relation to gender. Data were collected using a web survey in fall 2011. A total of 123 surveys were usable for this study. The key findings show that two data sets collected three years apart were consistent with each other, demonstrating that the persistence of gender differences in college students with respect to Wikipedia use, their perceived [[credibility]] of Wikipedia, and self-evaluation of their ability discerning the credibility of Wikipedia information. In addition, this study found that male students showed a higher level of satisficing with Wikipedia and tended to report a higher level of their peer's approval for Wikipedia than their female counterparts did. The findings call for attention to educational interventions to narrow the gender gap concerning Wikipedia or user-generated content (UGC).

Revision as of 08:13, 23 October 2020

Gender Differences Concerning Wikipedia: a Follow‐Up Study - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2012, written by Sook Lim.

Overview

This follow-up study of Lim and Kwon (2010) examined whether gender differences persist in certain aspects concerning Wikipedia. Additionally, this study examined other new variables, such as satisficing (satisfying and sufficing) and peer approval in relation to gender. Data were collected using a web survey in fall 2011. A total of 123 surveys were usable for this study. The key findings show that two data sets collected three years apart were consistent with each other, demonstrating that the persistence of gender differences in college students with respect to Wikipedia use, their perceived credibility of Wikipedia, and self-evaluation of their ability discerning the credibility of Wikipedia information. In addition, this study found that male students showed a higher level of satisficing with Wikipedia and tended to report a higher level of their peer's approval for Wikipedia than their female counterparts did. The findings call for attention to educational interventions to narrow the gender gap concerning Wikipedia or user-generated content (UGC).