Difference between revisions of "Die Zahnmedizin in Wikipedia: Eine Quantitative Und Qualitative"
(+ infobox) |
(Embed) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== Overview == | == Overview == | ||
Summary Lorenz A, Turp J C: Dentistry in [[Wikipedia]]: A quantitative and qualitative analysis (in German). Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 120: 1117–1121 (2010)The aim of this study was to assess the scientific quality of the 265 dental articles that were present in January 2008 in the German-language version of Wikipedia. For this purpose, the Wikipedia entries were examined for their correctness by comparing them with the current dental literature. Every ar-ticle was classified as having “textbook quality”, “partial text-book quality” or “missing textbook quality”. Of the 261 usable articles, 28% were qualitatively comparable to a textbook, while 56% had partial textbook quality. About 16% of the ar-ticles fell into the third group. Almost half of the Wikipedia entries fulfilled the qualitative standards, whereas the remain-ing articles were characterized by omissions. Hence, individu-als interested in dental topics should not exclusively rely on Wikipedia. For a cursory overview, however, a search in Wiki-pedia appears to be in order. | Summary Lorenz A, Turp J C: Dentistry in [[Wikipedia]]: A quantitative and qualitative analysis (in German). Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 120: 1117–1121 (2010)The aim of this study was to assess the scientific quality of the 265 dental articles that were present in January 2008 in the German-language version of Wikipedia. For this purpose, the Wikipedia entries were examined for their correctness by comparing them with the current dental literature. Every ar-ticle was classified as having “textbook quality”, “partial text-book quality” or “missing textbook quality”. Of the 261 usable articles, 28% were qualitatively comparable to a textbook, while 56% had partial textbook quality. About 16% of the ar-ticles fell into the third group. Almost half of the Wikipedia entries fulfilled the qualitative standards, whereas the remain-ing articles were characterized by omissions. Hence, individu-als interested in dental topics should not exclusively rely on Wikipedia. For a cursory overview, however, a search in Wiki-pedia appears to be in order. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Embed == | ||
+ | === Wikipedia Quality === | ||
+ | <code> | ||
+ | <nowiki> | ||
+ | Lorenz, Annette; Türp, Jens C.. (2010). "[[Die Zahnmedizin in Wikipedia: Eine Quantitative Und Qualitative]]". | ||
+ | </nowiki> | ||
+ | </code> | ||
+ | |||
+ | === English Wikipedia === | ||
+ | <code> | ||
+ | <nowiki> | ||
+ | {{cite journal |last1=Lorenz |first1=Annette |last2=Türp |first2=Jens C. |title=Die Zahnmedizin in Wikipedia: Eine Quantitative Und Qualitative |date=2010 |url=https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/Die_Zahnmedizin_in_Wikipedia:_Eine_Quantitative_Und_Qualitative}} | ||
+ | </nowiki> | ||
+ | </code> | ||
+ | |||
+ | === HTML === | ||
+ | <code> | ||
+ | <nowiki> | ||
+ | Lorenz, Annette; Türp, Jens C.. (2010). &quot;<a href="https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/Die_Zahnmedizin_in_Wikipedia:_Eine_Quantitative_Und_Qualitative">Die Zahnmedizin in Wikipedia: Eine Quantitative Und Qualitative</a>&quot;. | ||
+ | </nowiki> | ||
+ | </code> |
Revision as of 11:48, 27 October 2019
Authors | Annette Lorenz Jens C. Türp |
---|---|
Publication date | 2010 |
Links | Original Preprint |
Die Zahnmedizin in Wikipedia: Eine Quantitative Und Qualitative - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2010, written by Annette Lorenz and Jens C. Türp.
Overview
Summary Lorenz A, Turp J C: Dentistry in Wikipedia: A quantitative and qualitative analysis (in German). Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 120: 1117–1121 (2010)The aim of this study was to assess the scientific quality of the 265 dental articles that were present in January 2008 in the German-language version of Wikipedia. For this purpose, the Wikipedia entries were examined for their correctness by comparing them with the current dental literature. Every ar-ticle was classified as having “textbook quality”, “partial text-book quality” or “missing textbook quality”. Of the 261 usable articles, 28% were qualitatively comparable to a textbook, while 56% had partial textbook quality. About 16% of the ar-ticles fell into the third group. Almost half of the Wikipedia entries fulfilled the qualitative standards, whereas the remain-ing articles were characterized by omissions. Hence, individu-als interested in dental topics should not exclusively rely on Wikipedia. For a cursory overview, however, a search in Wiki-pedia appears to be in order.
Embed
Wikipedia Quality
Lorenz, Annette; Türp, Jens C.. (2010). "[[Die Zahnmedizin in Wikipedia: Eine Quantitative Und Qualitative]]".
English Wikipedia
{{cite journal |last1=Lorenz |first1=Annette |last2=Türp |first2=Jens C. |title=Die Zahnmedizin in Wikipedia: Eine Quantitative Und Qualitative |date=2010 |url=https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/Die_Zahnmedizin_in_Wikipedia:_Eine_Quantitative_Und_Qualitative}}
HTML
Lorenz, Annette; Türp, Jens C.. (2010). "<a href="https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/Die_Zahnmedizin_in_Wikipedia:_Eine_Quantitative_Und_Qualitative">Die Zahnmedizin in Wikipedia: Eine Quantitative Und Qualitative</a>".