Difference between revisions of "Contropedia - the Analysis and Visualization of Controversies in Wikipedia Articles"

From Wikipedia Quality
Jump to: navigation, search
(+ Embed)
(cat.)
 
Line 33: Line 33:
 
</nowiki>
 
</nowiki>
 
</code>
 
</code>
 +
 +
 +
 +
[[Category:Scientific works]]

Latest revision as of 08:09, 6 April 2021


Contropedia - the Analysis and Visualization of Controversies in Wikipedia Articles
Authors
Erik Borra
Esther Weltevrede
Paolo Ciuccarelli
Andreas Kaltenbrunner
David Laniado
Giovanni Magni
Michele Mauri
Richard Rogers
Tommaso Venturini
Publication date
2014
DOI
10.1145/2641580.2641622
Links
Original Preprint

Contropedia - the Analysis and Visualization of Controversies in Wikipedia Articles - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2014, written by Erik Borra, Esther Weltevrede, Paolo Ciuccarelli, Andreas Kaltenbrunner, David Laniado, Giovanni Magni, Michele Mauri, Richard Rogers and Tommaso Venturini.

Overview

Collaborative content creation inevitably reaches situations where different points of view lead to conflict. In Wikipedia, one of the most prominent examples of collaboration online, conflict is mediated by both policy and software, and conflicts often reflect larger societal debates. Contropedia is a platform for the analysis and visualization of such controversies in Wikipedia. Controversy metrics are extracted from activity streams generated by edits to, and discussions about, individual articles and groups of related articles. An article's revision history and its corresponding discussion pages constitute two parallel streams of user interactions that, taken together, fully describe the process of the collaborative creation of an article. Authors proposed platform, Contropedia, builds on state of the art techniques and extends current metrics for the analysis of both edit and discussion activity and visualizes these both as a layer on top of Wikipedia articles as well as a dashboard view presenting additional analytics. Furthermore, the combination of these two approaches allows for a deeper understanding of the substance, composition, actor alignment, trajectory and liveliness of controversies on Wikipedia. Authors research aims to provide a better understanding of socio-technical phenomena that take place on the web and to equip citizens with tools to fully deploy the complexity of controversies. Contropedia is useful for the general public as well as user groups with specific interests such as scientists, students, data journalists, decision makers and media communicators. Contropedia can be found at http://contropedia.net.

Embed

Wikipedia Quality

Borra, Erik; Weltevrede, Esther; Ciuccarelli, Paolo; Kaltenbrunner, Andreas; Laniado, David; Magni, Giovanni; Mauri, Michele; Rogers, Richard; Venturini, Tommaso. (2014). "[[Contropedia - the Analysis and Visualization of Controversies in Wikipedia Articles]]".DOI: 10.1145/2641580.2641622.

English Wikipedia

{{cite journal |last1=Borra |first1=Erik |last2=Weltevrede |first2=Esther |last3=Ciuccarelli |first3=Paolo |last4=Kaltenbrunner |first4=Andreas |last5=Laniado |first5=David |last6=Magni |first6=Giovanni |last7=Mauri |first7=Michele |last8=Rogers |first8=Richard |last9=Venturini |first9=Tommaso |title=Contropedia - the Analysis and Visualization of Controversies in Wikipedia Articles |date=2014 |doi=10.1145/2641580.2641622 |url=https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/Contropedia_-_the_Analysis_and_Visualization_of_Controversies_in_Wikipedia_Articles}}

HTML

Borra, Erik; Weltevrede, Esther; Ciuccarelli, Paolo; Kaltenbrunner, Andreas; Laniado, David; Magni, Giovanni; Mauri, Michele; Rogers, Richard; Venturini, Tommaso. (2014). &quot;<a href="https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/Contropedia_-_the_Analysis_and_Visualization_of_Controversies_in_Wikipedia_Articles">Contropedia - the Analysis and Visualization of Controversies in Wikipedia Articles</a>&quot;.DOI: 10.1145/2641580.2641622.