Difference between revisions of "Comparing Featured Article Groups and Revision Patterns Correlations in Wikipedia"

From Wikipedia Quality
Jump to: navigation, search
(Creating a new page - Comparing Featured Article Groups and Revision Patterns Correlations in Wikipedia)
 
(+ links)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Comparing Featured Article Groups and Revision Patterns Correlations in Wikipedia''' - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2009, written by Giacomo Poderi.
+
'''Comparing Featured Article Groups and Revision Patterns Correlations in Wikipedia''' - scientific work related to [[Wikipedia quality]] published in 2009, written by [[Giacomo Poderi]].
  
 
== Overview ==
 
== Overview ==
Collaboratively written by thousands of people, Wikipedia produces entries which are consistent with criteria agreed by Wikipedians and of high quality. This article focuses on Wikipedia’s Featured Articles and shows that not every contribution can be considered as being of equal quality. Two groups of articles are analysed by focusing on the edits distribution and the main editors’ contribution. The research shows how these aspects of the revision patterns can change dependent upon the category to which the articles belong.
+
Collaboratively written by thousands of people, [[Wikipedia]] produces entries which are consistent with criteria agreed by [[Wikipedians]] and of high quality. This article focuses on Wikipedia’s [[Featured Articles]] and shows that not every contribution can be considered as being of equal quality. Two groups of articles are analysed by focusing on the edits distribution and the main editors’ contribution. The research shows how these aspects of the revision patterns can change dependent upon the category to which the articles belong.

Revision as of 23:21, 26 September 2019

Comparing Featured Article Groups and Revision Patterns Correlations in Wikipedia - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2009, written by Giacomo Poderi.

Overview

Collaboratively written by thousands of people, Wikipedia produces entries which are consistent with criteria agreed by Wikipedians and of high quality. This article focuses on Wikipedia’s Featured Articles and shows that not every contribution can be considered as being of equal quality. Two groups of articles are analysed by focusing on the edits distribution and the main editors’ contribution. The research shows how these aspects of the revision patterns can change dependent upon the category to which the articles belong.