Difference between revisions of "Challenges Since Wikipedia: the Availability of Rorschach Information Online and Internet Users’ Reactions to Online Media Coverage of the Rorschach–Wikipedia Debate"
(Adding wikilinks) |
(+ infobox) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{Infobox work | ||
| + | | title = Challenges Since Wikipedia: the Availability of Rorschach Information Online and Internet Users’ Reactions to Online Media Coverage of the Rorschach–Wikipedia Debate | ||
| + | | date = 2012 | ||
| + | | authors = [[Douglas S. Schultz]]<br />[[James L. Loving]] | ||
| + | | doi = 10.1080/00223891.2011.627963 | ||
| + | | link = http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22176268 | ||
| + | }} | ||
'''Challenges Since Wikipedia: the Availability of Rorschach Information Online and Internet Users’ Reactions to Online Media Coverage of the Rorschach–Wikipedia Debate''' - scientific work related to [[Wikipedia quality]] published in 2012, written by [[Douglas S. Schultz]] and [[James L. Loving]]. | '''Challenges Since Wikipedia: the Availability of Rorschach Information Online and Internet Users’ Reactions to Online Media Coverage of the Rorschach–Wikipedia Debate''' - scientific work related to [[Wikipedia quality]] published in 2012, written by [[Douglas S. Schultz]] and [[James L. Loving]]. | ||
== Overview == | == Overview == | ||
Authors conducted 2 studies to assess the availability of Rorschach information online and Internet users’ attitudes since the inkblots were published on [[Wikipedia]]. In the first study, the authors conducted 2 [[Google]] searches for Web sites containing Rorschach-related information. The top 88 results were classified by level of threat to test security; 19% posed a direct threat. The authors also found Web sites authored by psychologists that divulged sensitive Rorschach information. In the second study, 588 comments to online news stories covering the Rorschach–Wikipedia debate were coded as expressing favorable or unfavorable opinions regarding the field of psychology, psychologists, and the Rorschach. Eight percent of comments described unfavorable opinions toward psychology, 15% contained unfavorable opinions toward psychologists, and 35% portrayed unfavorable opinions of the Rorschach. Common themes and popular misconceptions of the Rorschach contained in these comments are described. Implications and recomm... | Authors conducted 2 studies to assess the availability of Rorschach information online and Internet users’ attitudes since the inkblots were published on [[Wikipedia]]. In the first study, the authors conducted 2 [[Google]] searches for Web sites containing Rorschach-related information. The top 88 results were classified by level of threat to test security; 19% posed a direct threat. The authors also found Web sites authored by psychologists that divulged sensitive Rorschach information. In the second study, 588 comments to online news stories covering the Rorschach–Wikipedia debate were coded as expressing favorable or unfavorable opinions regarding the field of psychology, psychologists, and the Rorschach. Eight percent of comments described unfavorable opinions toward psychology, 15% contained unfavorable opinions toward psychologists, and 35% portrayed unfavorable opinions of the Rorschach. Common themes and popular misconceptions of the Rorschach contained in these comments are described. Implications and recomm... | ||
Revision as of 06:57, 13 June 2020
Authors | Douglas S. Schultz James L. Loving |
|---|---|
Publication date | 2012 |
DOI | 10.1080/00223891.2011.627963 |
Links | Original |
Challenges Since Wikipedia: the Availability of Rorschach Information Online and Internet Users’ Reactions to Online Media Coverage of the Rorschach–Wikipedia Debate - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2012, written by Douglas S. Schultz and James L. Loving.
Overview
Authors conducted 2 studies to assess the availability of Rorschach information online and Internet users’ attitudes since the inkblots were published on Wikipedia. In the first study, the authors conducted 2 Google searches for Web sites containing Rorschach-related information. The top 88 results were classified by level of threat to test security; 19% posed a direct threat. The authors also found Web sites authored by psychologists that divulged sensitive Rorschach information. In the second study, 588 comments to online news stories covering the Rorschach–Wikipedia debate were coded as expressing favorable or unfavorable opinions regarding the field of psychology, psychologists, and the Rorschach. Eight percent of comments described unfavorable opinions toward psychology, 15% contained unfavorable opinions toward psychologists, and 35% portrayed unfavorable opinions of the Rorschach. Common themes and popular misconceptions of the Rorschach contained in these comments are described. Implications and recomm...
