Difference between revisions of "Alternative Interfaces for Deletion Discussions in Wikipedia: Some Proposals Using Decision Factors"
(Adding wikilinks) |
(+ Infobox work) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{Infobox work | ||
| + | | title = Alternative Interfaces for Deletion Discussions in Wikipedia: Some Proposals Using Decision Factors | ||
| + | | date = 2012 | ||
| + | | authors = [[Jodi Schneider]]<br />[[Krystian Samp]] | ||
| + | | doi = 10.1145/2462932.2462972 | ||
| + | | link = http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2462932.2462972 | ||
| + | }} | ||
'''Alternative Interfaces for Deletion Discussions in Wikipedia: Some Proposals Using Decision Factors''' - scientific work related to [[Wikipedia quality]] published in 2012, written by [[Jodi Schneider]] and [[Krystian Samp]]. | '''Alternative Interfaces for Deletion Discussions in Wikipedia: Some Proposals Using Decision Factors''' - scientific work related to [[Wikipedia quality]] published in 2012, written by [[Jodi Schneider]] and [[Krystian Samp]]. | ||
== Overview == | == Overview == | ||
Content deletion is an important mechanism for maintaining quality in online communities. In [[Wikipedia]], deletion is guided by complex procedures. Controversial cases (~12% [4]) are sent to special community discussions called "Articles for Deletion" (AfD). Deciding the outcome of these deletion debates can be difficult. Further, deletion seems to be a point of friction, which demotivates new editors without sufficiently informing them about Wikipedia's values and standards. | Content deletion is an important mechanism for maintaining quality in online communities. In [[Wikipedia]], deletion is guided by complex procedures. Controversial cases (~12% [4]) are sent to special community discussions called "Articles for Deletion" (AfD). Deciding the outcome of these deletion debates can be difficult. Further, deletion seems to be a point of friction, which demotivates new editors without sufficiently informing them about Wikipedia's values and standards. | ||
Revision as of 01:28, 12 August 2019
Authors | Jodi Schneider Krystian Samp |
|---|---|
Publication date | 2012 |
DOI | 10.1145/2462932.2462972 |
Links | Original |
Alternative Interfaces for Deletion Discussions in Wikipedia: Some Proposals Using Decision Factors - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2012, written by Jodi Schneider and Krystian Samp.
Overview
Content deletion is an important mechanism for maintaining quality in online communities. In Wikipedia, deletion is guided by complex procedures. Controversial cases (~12% [4]) are sent to special community discussions called "Articles for Deletion" (AfD). Deciding the outcome of these deletion debates can be difficult. Further, deletion seems to be a point of friction, which demotivates new editors without sufficiently informing them about Wikipedia's values and standards.
