Difference between revisions of "Academics Can Help Shape Wikipedia"
(Academics Can Help Shape Wikipedia -- new article) |
(Wikilinks) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Academics Can Help Shape Wikipedia''' - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2017, written by Thomas Shafee, Daniel Mietchen and Andrew I. Su. | + | '''Academics Can Help Shape Wikipedia''' - scientific work related to [[Wikipedia quality]] published in 2017, written by [[Thomas Shafee]], [[Daniel Mietchen]] and [[Andrew I. Su]]. |
== Overview == | == Overview == | ||
| − | Public understanding of science is increasingly important. Wikipedia is widely used by students, educators, researchers, doctors, journalists, and policy-makers. The online, crowd-sourced encyclopedia site is perceived as increasingly trustworthy, making it a key public engagement platform with | + | Public understanding of science is increasingly important. [[Wikipedia]] is widely used by students, educators, researchers, doctors, journalists, and policy-makers. The online, crowd-sourced encyclopedia site is perceived as increasingly trustworthy, making it a key public engagement platform with |
Revision as of 01:54, 9 January 2021
Academics Can Help Shape Wikipedia - scientific work related to Wikipedia quality published in 2017, written by Thomas Shafee, Daniel Mietchen and Andrew I. Su.
Overview
Public understanding of science is increasingly important. Wikipedia is widely used by students, educators, researchers, doctors, journalists, and policy-makers. The online, crowd-sourced encyclopedia site is perceived as increasingly trustworthy, making it a key public engagement platform with
