Difference between revisions of "A Breakdown of Quality Flaws in Wikipedia"
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== Overview == | == Overview == | ||
− | The online encyclopedia [[Wikipedia]] is a successful example of the increasing popularity of user generated content on the Web. Despite its success, Wikipedia is often criticized for containing low-quality information, which is mainly attributed to its core policy of being open for editing by everyone. The identification of low-quality information is an important task since Wikipedia has become the primary source of knowledge for a huge number of people around the world. Previous research on quality assessment in Wikipedia either investigates only small samples of articles, or else focuses on single quality aspects, like accuracy or formality. This paper targets the investigation of quality flaws, and presents the first complete breakdown of Wikipedia's quality flaw structure. Authors conduct an extensive exploratory analysis, which reveals (1) the quality flaws that actually exist, (2) the distribution of flaws in Wikipedia, and (3) the extent of flawed content. An important finding is that more than one in four English Wikipedia articles contains at least one quality flaw, 70% of which concern article verifiability. | + | The online encyclopedia [[Wikipedia]] is a successful example of the increasing popularity of user generated content on the Web. Despite its success, Wikipedia is often criticized for containing low-quality information, which is mainly attributed to its core policy of being open for editing by everyone. The identification of low-quality information is an important task since Wikipedia has become the primary source of knowledge for a huge number of people around the world. Previous research on quality assessment in Wikipedia either investigates only small samples of articles, or else focuses on single quality aspects, like accuracy or formality. This paper targets the investigation of quality flaws, and presents the first complete breakdown of Wikipedia's quality flaw structure. Authors conduct an extensive exploratory analysis, which reveals (1) the [[quality flaws]] that actually exist, (2) the distribution of flaws in Wikipedia, and (3) the extent of flawed content. An important finding is that more than one in four English Wikipedia articles contains at least one quality flaw, 70% of which concern article verifiability. |
+ | |||
+ | Distribution over the topics was created based on [[category system]]. "Category:Articles" was as a starting point for browsing categories that contain only articles. Authors used the 24 direct subcategories of "Category:Main topic classifications" as top-level-topics. | ||
== Embed == | == Embed == | ||
Line 38: | Line 40: | ||
[[Category:Scientific works]] | [[Category:Scientific works]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Quality flaws]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Wikipedia main topic classifications]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Categories in Wikipedia]] |
Revision as of 19:32, 16 May 2019
Authors | Maik Anderka Benno Maria Stein |
---|---|
Publication date | 2012 |
ISBN | 978-145031237-0 |
DOI | 10.1145/2184305.2184309 |
Links | Original Preprint |
A Breakdown of Quality Flaws in Wikipedia - scientific work about Wikipedia quality published in 2012, written by Maik Anderka and Benno Maria Stein.
Overview
The online encyclopedia Wikipedia is a successful example of the increasing popularity of user generated content on the Web. Despite its success, Wikipedia is often criticized for containing low-quality information, which is mainly attributed to its core policy of being open for editing by everyone. The identification of low-quality information is an important task since Wikipedia has become the primary source of knowledge for a huge number of people around the world. Previous research on quality assessment in Wikipedia either investigates only small samples of articles, or else focuses on single quality aspects, like accuracy or formality. This paper targets the investigation of quality flaws, and presents the first complete breakdown of Wikipedia's quality flaw structure. Authors conduct an extensive exploratory analysis, which reveals (1) the quality flaws that actually exist, (2) the distribution of flaws in Wikipedia, and (3) the extent of flawed content. An important finding is that more than one in four English Wikipedia articles contains at least one quality flaw, 70% of which concern article verifiability.
Distribution over the topics was created based on category system. "Category:Articles" was as a starting point for browsing categories that contain only articles. Authors used the 24 direct subcategories of "Category:Main topic classifications" as top-level-topics.
Embed
Wikipedia Quality
Anderka, Maik; Stein, Benno Maria. (2012). "[[A Breakdown of Quality Flaws in Wikipedia]]". ACM International Conference Proceeding Series 2012, pp. 11-18. ISBN: 978-145031237-0. DOI: 10.1145/2184305.2184309.
English Wikipedia
{{cite journal |last1=Anderka |first1=Maik |last2=Stein |first2=Benno Maria |title=A Breakdown of Quality Flaws in Wikipedia |date=2012 |isbn=978-145031237-0 |doi=10.1145/2184305.2184309 |url=https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/A_Breakdown_of_Quality_Flaws_in_Wikipedia |journal=ACM International Conference Proceeding Series 2012, pp. 11-18}}
HTML
Anderka, Maik; Stein, Benno Maria. (2012). "<a href="https://wikipediaquality.com/wiki/A_Breakdown_of_Quality_Flaws_in_Wikipedia">A Breakdown of Quality Flaws in Wikipedia</a>". ACM International Conference Proceeding Series 2012, pp. 11-18. ISBN: 978-145031237-0. DOI: 10.1145/2184305.2184309.